Laserfiche WebLink
Generally the surface soils consisted of a sandy clays and clayey sand. As <br /> shallow percolation tests proved inadequate for conventional septic systems, deep <br /> percolation tests were performed. <br /> Shallow Test <br /> One percolation test was performed in a hole with 8 inches in diameter by 42 <br /> inches deep backfilled with 2 inches of gravel. The two holes were filled with <br /> water 24 hours prior to running the test. The test holes for Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 <br /> were performed under a 4 hour test. The last half hour of the tests reading for <br /> Parcel 1 were witriessed by a County Health Official and the test data obtained is <br /> enclosed in the Appendix. .,,. 07 � <br /> _ Parcel Number Percolation Rate 7� !�y�oA- y <br /> 1_ 80 min./in. / _ ,Gly' ✓�a�/� <br /> 2 0 min./in. <br /> Deep Test ^ <br /> Neil O. Anderson and Associates was retained to perform the deep tests. \I <br /> See the appendix for their results. As the holes encountered water after the 24 ` <br /> hour pre-soak, Anderson recommends engineered systems when new septics are <br /> installed. <br /> VII. GROUNDWATER <br /> A Groundwater test was performed on the adjacent property well. The well <br /> was tested for nitrates and DBCP. The samples were taken by Mike Toy of Dillon <br /> & Murphy and driven directly to Precision Enviro-Tech. Water was taken from a <br /> spigot at the house. The results can be found in the appendix. The results did not <br /> yield any reason of concern regarding groundwater in the area. <br /> VIII. CONCLUSION <br /> Based on the results of the percolation test and the soil profile, it is Dillon & <br /> Murphy's opinion that the existing homesite resulting from the proposed parcel split <br /> of the subject property are suited for an engineered on-site sewage disposal <br /> system. The soil type and lithology is homogenous in the immediate area and leach <br /> lines with pits have worked sufficiently. The proposed system however, should be <br /> properly designed and installed according to the current San Joaquin County <br /> criteria. <br /> 2 <br /> CA01116\SOILS REPORT 082703 <br />