My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0005021
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SPUD
>
11330
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0500224
>
SU0005021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2020 4:37:01 PM
Creation date
9/9/2019 10:19:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0005021
PE
2626
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0500224
STREET_NUMBER
11330
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
SPUD
STREET_TYPE
IS
City
STOCKTON
APN
12929001
ENTERED_DATE
5/5/2005 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
11330 W SPUD IS
RECEIVED_DATE
4/26/2005 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\S\SPUD ISLAND\11330\PA-0500224\SU0005021\EH PERM.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle(VELB). Initial surveys detected several elderberry <br /> shrubs scattered within the upland habitats of the project. Due to the season of the survey <br /> (winter),elderberry shrubs were not readily identifiable. It is likely that more elderberry <br /> shrubs area present within the project area. Avoidance of impacts to elderberry shrubs <br /> often requires construction buffers as great as 100 feet around each shrub. Unavoidable <br /> impacts to elderberries may require shrub transplant and compensatory plantings of <br /> elderberries and associated plant species. 'These mitigation measures are based upon the <br /> VELB Conservation Guidelines (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1999). Construction <br /> buffers for the protection of elderberry shrubs vary depending upon the nature and scope <br /> of the project. Preparation of a Biological Assessment in consultation with the U.S. Fish <br /> and Wildlife Service (USFWS) would be necessary to determine the appropriate <br /> minimization, avoidance and compensatory mitigation measures for this project. <br /> The results of these surveys and analysis of biological constraints were conducted to the <br /> level necessary for conceptual project planning. These surveys were not intended to be <br /> conducted according to agency"protocol' levels. Consultation with USFWS and CDFG <br /> would likely require the preparation of a formal Biological Assessment, including a <br /> detailed project description, a quantitative analysis of project impacts to special status <br /> species habitat, and a detailed description of proposed mitigation,minimization and <br /> avoidance measures. <br /> Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional information. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Bill Roper <br /> Associate Biologist <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.