SU0007270_SSCRPT - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

x 19 June 2008 AGE-NC Project No. 08-1612 Page 14 of 16 • Land use of the surrounding properties was generally agricultural and residential; available historical resources from at least 1914 show the property as agricultural and rural residential l land. • At the time of the site visit,the subject property included two residences;the southern-most residence (residence 1) had a detached garage/dressing room and pool. • The subject property southern property line was flanked by a brick and wrought iron fence with a wrought iron gate that opened to the property's asphalt driveway off of East Highway 26 east of Nord Road. The remaining property line was bound by mixed wood and wire fencing. • East of residence 2,the driveway led to the barn building complex,which was comprised of approximately six structures, a silo (containing firewood)and a corral. The six structures of the barn complex included the following: a garage; a barn utilized for storage with a repair shop at the western end of the structure;an inactive stall utilized for storage;a stall containing horses; a long rectangular stall utilized for storage and containing a chicken coop at the eastern end; and a long warehouse. An irrigation well and pump were visible east of the eastern-most structure(long rectangular stall with chicken coop)of the barn complex along the property line. • AGE inspected the soil underlying the miscellaneous storage areas in the barn complex stalls (Figure 2) and noted no obvious soil staining or foul odors. • The storage areas of the stalls were inspected for agricultural chemicals;none were observed. • Approximately six empty 55-gallon drums were located in the eastern-most stalls converted to a storage area immediately west of the chicken coop (Figure 2). Mr. Skobrak reported the drums had originally contained diesel for the site tractor and the drums were no longer used. AGE did not observe any stained soil or hydrocarbon odors around the drums. • AGE did not inspect the interior of the silo; according to the property owner, the container was used for firewood storage only. AGE did not inspect the interior of the residences, the garages, or barn. • The subject property was served by private water wells and septic systems. • There were no obvious indications of stained soil or burned and distressed vegetation noted on the subject property. Walnut orchards were located north and south of the site residences. • AGE noted no evidence of the current or past use of ASTs, USTs or fill pipes for USTs on the agricultural, including barn complex,portion of the property or in the residential areas. (5,Z • The residential complex was not inspected for asbestos-containing materials (ACMs). AGE has no direct knowledge that the residential structures contains ACMs. Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc.