Laserfiche WebLink
Table 2 <br /> Love's Travel Stops and Country Stores <br /> DEIR Alternatives Analysis <br /> summary of Traffic Impacts for Proposed Project and Project Alternatives[1] <br /> Daily Trips <br /> Additional <br /> Development on Percentage <br /> Project( Remaining Difference from <br /> Item Project Alternative[2] Land [3) Total Proposed Project <br /> Fwmela e b c=e+b d=c-4.532/4,532 <br /> Proposed Project 4,532 0 4,532 0% <br /> Alternative 1:No Project <br /> Option 1:No Project[4] 16 0 16 -100% <br /> Option 2:Retail Use[5] 0 12,661 12,661 179% <br /> Alternative 2;Reduced Project Size <br /> Option 1:Travel Stop on Remaining Land 2,266 2,266 4,532 0% <br /> Option 2:Retail on Remaining Land 2,266 9,319 11,585 156% <br /> Alternative 3:Combination Gasoline Station <br /> Option 1:Combination Gas Station on Remaining Land 1,950 16,269 18,219 302% <br /> Option 2:Retail on Remaining Land 1,950 12,039 13,989 209% <br /> Alternative 4:Retail with Fast-Food Restaurant <br /> Option 1:Retail and Fast-Food on Remaining Land 2,276 24,850 27,126 499% <br /> Option 2:Retail on Remaining Land 2,276 12,175 14,451 219% <br /> tre fic <br /> Sauce:Omni-Means;EPS. <br /> [1] Derived from Love's Travel Stops EIR—Project Alternatives Trip Generation Analysis memorandum,Omni-Means,January 21,2013. <br /> [2] Daily trips for the Proposed Project and each Project alternative contained in the September 2012 Draft Environmental Impact Report(DEIR)for Love's Travel Stops. <br /> [3] Assumes that the undeveloped acreage of each reduced Project alternative will be developed under two development options. Option 1 assumes the same <br /> land use as proposed under each DEIR alternative;Option 2 assumes a"reasonable worst case"retail trip generation condition consistent with the <br /> California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)as allowed under the current CFS zoning. Daily trips for each Project alternative option contained in the <br /> Omnl-Means memorandum. <br /> [4] Option 1 is limited to those uses that"allowed by right under CS-F zoning"(a small group care facility with a maximum of 6 occupants. <br /> (5) Option 2 assumes full development of the site with retail uses and does not assume the small amount of development"allowed by right under CSF zoning" <br /> under Option 1 would remain. <br /> Prepared by EPS f12W2013 <br /> varazuxnvsrsiew..r,.idsroa�vs co-,.nraalsr m i w-aarsnm <br /> EXHIBIT I <br />