Laserfiche WebLink
The Grupe Company Page 6 <br /> January 21,2013 <br /> Option 1 assumes ten additional fast-food restaurants and approximately 70,000 sq. ft. of retail uses. The <br /> total trip generation for this option is 27,126 daily trips, 2,094 AM peak hour trips and 2,174 PM peak <br /> hour trips. This equates to a 1,000 percent increase in trips compared with the EIR alternative, and <br /> approximately a 500 percent increase in trips as compared to the proposed travel stop project. <br /> Based upon this significant increase in trip generation this alternative would result in a significant <br /> deterioration in intersection LOS conditions as compared to the proposed project LOS conditions. <br /> Option 2:Retail uses for remainder of land <br /> Option 2 assumes two fast-food restaurants totaling 6,000 sq. ft., a grocery store at 25,000 sq. ft and <br /> general retail store at 85,495 sq. ft. The trip generation for this option is 14,451 daily trips,702 AM peak <br /> hour trips and 1,221 PM peak hour trips.This equates to a 500 percent increase in trips compared with the <br /> EIR alternative,and approximately a 200 percent increase in trips as compared to the proposed travel stop <br /> project. <br /> Based upon this significant increase in trip generation this alternative would result in a significant <br /> deterioration in intersection LOS conditions as compared to the proposed project LOS conditions. <br /> Table 6 provides a summary of trip generation for this alternative. <br /> TABLE 6 <br /> 77 ALTERNATIVE 4 FULL SITE DEVELOPMENT TRIP GENERATION <br /> Fa,r 710.70a�es <br /> ERR Alternadw4 2,276 176 182 <br /> Option 1:Retail andfast food use for 24,850 1,918 1,991 <br /> remainin land <br /> Option 1:Total Trips 27,126 2,094 2,174 i <br /> Change in trips compared to proposed 1 <br /> 22,594 1,788 1,793 <br /> travel stop project <br /> 'Percentage change in trips compared to 499% 584% 470% <br /> proposed trevel stop project <br /> Change in trips compared m EIR <br /> 24,850 1,918 7,991 i <br /> iAliernative 4 i <br /> Percentage change in trips compared to 1092% 1092% 1092%1 <br /> EIX Alternative 4 I <br /> Option 2:Retail use for remaining <br /> 10.70 acres 12,175 526 1,038 <br /> ;land <br /> 'Option 2:Total Trips 11.68 acres 14,451 702 1,221 <br /> j Change in trips compared to proposed 9,919 396 840 <br /> travel stop project <br /> Percentage change in trips compared to <br /> f 219% 129'60 220% <br /> proposed travel stop project <br /> Change in trips compared to FJR 11,175 526 1,038 <br /> Alternative 4 <br /> ;Percentage change in trips compared to 535% 300% 569911 <br /> ED?Alternative 4 t <br /> EXHIBIT 2 <br />