Laserfiche WebLink
There is a septic system and a domestic well on site According to the owner, there <br /> are no buried tanks on the property. There are not visual signs of any such tanks <br /> (ground settling, irregular ground, etc.). <br /> There is not a pond to retain storm runoff from the 80 acre parcel. Rainwater is <br /> disposed of by natural drainage, percolation, or evaporation. <br /> As previously stated, the site has been farmed with cherries and wheat. The owner <br /> farms the property. There are no chemicals permanently stored onsite. See the <br /> Appendix for chemicals that have historically been used on the site. The farmer applies <br /> these products with his own personnel under County permit (Permit No. 39-03- <br /> 3904674). They are used in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. <br /> A brief summary of chemicals applied historically, paraquat, methyl bromide, <br /> chloropicrin, and sevin. See Appendix for a full list of chemicals used in that area and <br /> additional detail regarding chemical use. <br /> The depth to groundwater in this vicinity is approximately 90 feet. The soil type is <br /> generally loam. The types of products used on this site are consistent with the <br /> surroun ing property. <br /> According to the landowner, there are no known chemical containers buried on the <br /> property. A visual inspection did not produce any evidence_of ed containers. The <br /> field investigation also did not yield any unusual (noxious orders. <br /> CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION . <br /> Based on visual observation, County records noted, and testimony of the property <br /> owners and tenant, there appears to be no surface contamination. Given the scope of <br /> this study, the probability of subsurface contamination should be considered low and <br /> normal to this region. Based on visual observation, no corrective action is necessary at <br /> this time. <br /> 2 <br /> C:\Dillon&Murphy\0326\Surface&Subsurface Report <br />