Laserfiche WebLink
Musco Family Olive Company _ 10 - 12 December 2006 , <br /> Well MW-2 <br /> Well MW-2 is a deep well and groundwater collected from well MW-2 has a distinct chemical <br /> signature when compared to other wells at the Musca site. Table 7 above summarizes the last <br /> four sampling events and concentrations detected in well MW-2. Groundwater observed in <br /> well MW-2 appears to be of marine origin as: evidenced by the elevated concentrations of <br /> TDS, chloride, and sodium. The chemical analytical data from well MW-2 will not be <br /> evaluated. <br /> Newly Installed Wells <br /> At the request of the Regional Water Board, Musco has installed one deep and three shallow <br /> wells to monitor groundwater quality beneath the Title 27 surface impoundments. The one <br /> deep well was installed near the northwest corner of Pond A to a depth of approximately 110 <br /> feet bgs. The well was constructed with 20 (90 to 110 feet) feet of machine slotted well <br /> screen. The two shallow wells were installed northeast and southeast of Pond B to become <br /> the down-gradient compliance wells; the third shallow well was installed southwest of Pond A <br /> to become the rip-gradient compliance well. All three shallow wells were installed to an <br /> approximate depth of 70 feet bgs and constructed with 20 (50 to 70 feet) feet of machine <br /> slotted well screen. A report of well installation and initial compliance sampling is pending. <br /> REVIEW OF GROUNDWATER DATA <br /> It is important to note the Musca site is situated in a complicated geologic environment where <br /> high strength wastewater and/or Pond solids have been land applied since early 1980. Since <br /> no onsite groundwater,data exists prior to the installation of the 13 groundwater monitoring <br /> wells in 2002, predischarge groundwater quality at the Musco property was not established. <br /> According to WDR No_ R5-2002-0148, Finding No. 48, the Discharger has not proposed a <br /> method or rationale for calculating background concentrations. Board staff had previously <br /> proposed the use of wells MW-1 and MW-8 to calculate background groundwater <br /> concentrations. However, the Discharger disagreed with the use of these wells, and Board <br /> staff agreed that further refinement of the site specific groundwater quality was necessary. <br /> As interim background groundwater quality data, Board staff determined that Musco's <br /> production well should be used for groundwater quality limits. The Discharger was to propose <br /> final background groundwater concentrations within two years of the revised WDRs No. <br /> R5-2002-0148. Current average analytical data for existing groundwater monitoring wells and <br /> interim background groundwater concentrations are shown in Table 9. The data for the <br /> monitoring wells is derived from the last four available sampling events of each well. <br /> TABLE 9 <br /> Average Groundwater Concentrations <br /> Well ID TDS' CI Na HCO3 <br /> (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) <br /> Production Well* 2047 601 591 NA <br />