My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0005250
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
V
>
VIA NICOLO
>
17950
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0500462
>
SU0005250
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:31:34 AM
Creation date
9/9/2019 10:57:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0005250
PE
2631
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0500462
STREET_NUMBER
17950
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
VIA NICOLO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95377
APN
20911031& 32
ENTERED_DATE
7/26/2005 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
17950 W VIA NICOLO RD
RECEIVED_DATE
7/25/2005 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\V\VIA NICOLO\17950\PA-0500462\SU0005250\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\V\VIA NICOLO\17950\PA-0500462\SU0005250\CDD OK.PDF \MIGRATIONS\V\VIA NICOLO\17950\PA-0500462\SU0005250\EH COND.PDF \MIGRATIONS\V\VIA NICOLO\17950\PA-0500462\SU0005250\EH PERM.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ben Hail -6- 22 November 2006 <br /> Musco Family Olive Company <br /> 10. WDRs Order No. R5-2002-0148 includes Effluent Limitation C.3.b, which requires that the <br /> "maximum BOD5 loading to the LTUs shall not exceed-..1001bs/acre•day as a 7-day <br /> average". This limitation was violated on 83 occasions described in the following table: <br /> Field Date of Ave. BOD Field Date of Ave. BOD Field Date of Ave. BOD <br /> Seventh Day (lbs/ac-day) Seventh Day (lbs/ac-day) Seventh Day (lbs/ac-day) <br /> 95-02 8-Sep-2005 100 95-06 25-Sep-2005 106 95-13 13-Oct-2005 123 <br /> 95-02 9 Sep-2005 105 95-06 26-Sep-2005 114 95-13 14-Oct-2005 113 <br /> 95-02 11 Sep-2005 115 95-06 27-Sep-2005 109 95-13 15-Oct-2005 113. <br /> 95-02 12 Sep-2005 120 95-06 28-Sep-2005 101 95-13 16-Oct-2005 112 <br /> 95-02 13 Sep-2005 112 95-07 8-Sep-2005 105 95-13 17-Oct-2005 127 <br /> 95-02 14 Sep-2005 103 95-07 9-Sep-2005 . f- 115 95-1.3.. .18-Oct-2005, a; ,"132 <br /> 95-05 9-Sep-2005 104 95-07 10-Sep-2005 1137] 95-13 19-Oct-2005 137 <br /> 95-05 10-Sep-2005 102 95-07 11-Sep-2005 126 95-13 20-Oct-2005 131 <br /> 95-05 11-Sep-2005 114 95-07 12-Sep-2005 132 95-13 21-Oct-2005 138 <br /> 95-05 12-Sep-2005 120 95-07 13-Sep-2005 121 95-13 22-Oct-2005 164 <br /> 95-05 13-Sep-2005 110 95-07 14-Sep-2005 110 95-13 23-Oct-2005 168 <br /> 95-06 8-Sep-2005 127 95-07 17-Sep-2005 -102 95-13 24-Oct-2005 149 <br /> 95-06 9-Sep-2005 139 95-07 20-Oct-2005 102 95-13 25-Oct-2005 139 <br /> 95-06 10-Sep-2005 136 95-07 21-Oct-2005 105 95-13 26-Oct-2005 119 " <br /> 95-06 1 1,-Sep-2005 152 95-07124-Oct-2006 <br /> Oct-2005 117 95-13 27-Oct-2005 111 <br /> 95-06 12-Sep-2005 160 95-07Oct-2005 120 95-13 28-Oct-2005 101 <br /> 95-06 13-Sep-2005 146 95-07 112 95-16 8-Se -2005104 <br /> 95-06 14-Sep-2005 133. 95-09ep-2005 108 95-16 9-Sep-2005 108 <br /> 95-06 15-Sep-2005 120 95-09 9-Sep-2005 113 95-16 10-Sep-2005 101 <br /> 95-06 16-Sep-2005 120 95-09 10-Sep-2005 106 95-16 11-Sep-2005 119 <br /> 95-06 17-Sep-2005 124 95-09 11-Sep-2005 124 95-16 12-Sep-2005 124 <br /> 95-06 18-Sep-2005 121 95-09 12-Se -2005 130 95-16 13-Sep-2005 116 <br /> 95-06 19-Sep-2005 103 95-09 13-Sep-2005 121 95-16 14-Sep-2005 106 <br /> 95-06 20-Sep-2005 110 95-09 14-Sep-2005 111 95-16 16-Sep-2005 100 <br /> 95-06 21-Sep-2005 110 95-09 15-Sep-2005 1 101 95-16 17-Sep-2005 103 <br /> 95-06 22-Sep-2005 115 95-09 16-Sep-2005 104 95-18 15-Jul-2006 104 <br /> 95-06 23=Sep=2005` °~�112- r,.. 95=09 -17-Sep-2005- 107. . -...- 95-18 ,_16-Jul-2006- 102 <br /> 95-06 24-Sep-2005 114 95-13 12-Oct-2005 106 <br /> In addition, while the WDRs express this limitation as a 7-day average, the DSMRs report <br /> only weekly averages. <br /> 11. WDRs Order No. R5-2002-0148 includes Effluent Limitation C.4, which requires <br /> "[w]astewater discharged to the.LTUs [to].not have a pH of less than 6.5 or greater than <br /> 8.5." Since wastewater discharged to the land application areas is from the 84-million <br /> gallon pond, pH values from this pond were used in assessing compliance with Effluent <br /> Limitation C.4. The maximum pond pH requirement of 8.5 was violated in the 84-million <br /> gallon pond on 10 occasions, out of 321 days with both discharge to the LTUs and_ <br /> monitoring of pH in the 84-million gallon pond, as shown in the following table: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.