SU0000503 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

traffic over it. Comm. Carter asked why the "cast-in-place pipe" was ever put in. Mr. Moore responded that the cost is about 1/3 less than a "reinforced pipe. " Comm. Gillispie observed that the District is using "cast-in-place pipe" and when there is a request that a pipe be relocated, they are asking the property owner to replace it with a very expensive reinforced pipe. As to the replacement of the bridge, he said he could see no reason for the Oakdale Irrigation District to have a condition to replace the bridge. He said he felt the requirements from San Joaquin County, regarding the bridge, would be sufficient. He said he would be in favor of upholding the appeal on item 4 .g. and modify 4 .h. to delete "including the bridge across Lone Tree Creek, for O. I.D. approval. " He said he felt the requirement of a parallel system (stated in 4 .d. ) was excessive and he would uphold the appeal on that item. He felt that conditions 4 .a. and 4.b. should be retained. The line should be removed from the potential right of way, but the line should be replaced with another cast-in- place pipe. However, he would leave those two conditions as they are written. Comm. Jungeblut said he felt that the Oakdale Irrigation District was right. He said the right-of-way will eventually cover the line. He was not in favor of using the cast-in-place pipe for the replacement of the pipe. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Gillispie-Carter) and carried by a vote of 7-0 to uphold the appeal on the Oakdale Irrigation District requirements Numbers 4 .d and 4 .g. ; to modify 4 .h. ; and to deny the appeal of Condition Numbers 4 .a. , 4 .b. , and 4 .c. Condition Numbers 4.d and 4 .g deleted Condition Number 4 .h: Provide improvement plans for irrigation facilities to be constructed. These plans are to be prepared by a licensed engineer. --------------------------------------------------------------- _4_