Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> I <br /> Mr. Dalton informed the applicant that the Montezuma Fire District requires a fire hydrant, and <br /> indicated on the plan where the best area'would be. <br /> : Mr. Neely reviewed the Department of Public Works requirements. Mr. Neely asked i <br /> �Mr. Nunez if he would like to pay a fee_ for the Department of Public Works to put a Board <br /> acket together for him and have the County Surveyor take the final map to the Board to be <br /> p 3 <br /> accepted. <br /> li I <br /> Mr. Nunez indicated yes. <br /> Ali <br /> 10:3© a.m. 3. USE PERMIT APPLICATION NO. UP-99-25 REVISIONS OF <br /> JF APPROVED ACTIONS OF LARRY. & CARLENE METTLER (C/O <br /> ARBOR VINEYARDS, INC.) A Revision of Approved Actions of Use <br /> Permit application #or a small winery (500 case). Revisions to include . <br /> (1) The addition of, Marketing events. (2) The use of portable toilets at the <br /> events. (3) No installation of_a new well. (4) A one-year Time Extension. <br /> Project will utilize existing shed and 00 fe�north of Kettlemae grown on n Lane, <br /> on the west side of Alpine Road, 12 <br /> of Lodi (APN: 049=210-05; 15451 N. Alpine Road, Lodi). , <br /> . €I <br /> & Larry Mettler, Arbor Vineyards were present for this <br /> Jeff Fisher, Associate Planner; Charlene <br /> item. j <br /> F <br /> Mr. Fisher.introduced the project. <br /> e not <br /> Mrs. Mettler indicated that there is nand that then are a smalltlWineryer cand want toes stay small <br /> asking for a Boutique Winery status, they <br /> 'are <br /> -Mr. Martin informed the applicants that the Community Development Department is not <br /> changing the status of the winery, and that the winery is still Food Manufacturing under the old <br /> e size of the inery in terms of <br /> ordinance. Mr. Martin indicated th naMarketingetithey were �ng Eveat n s, as th ugh it wea Boutique <br /> volume and applying the current ordinance, <br /> Winery, but not changing the status of the project. <br /> Ms. Mettler indicated that they would do the perk test but asked if there was another study that <br /> could be made instead of such a costly one as the soil suitability study/nitrate loading. Ms. <br /> Mettler informed staff that their wicases and asked <br /> nery would not go aver fi es that hhundred e roe petted what they <br /> why such a big test Is required. Mr. Godinho informed the Mettlero that <br /> ' e <br /> saying and he explained the need <br /> for <br /> the asked why couldn'teinformed <br /> they use waternddisposal r. habove <br /> there is very little wastewater used, <br /> ground unless they become large and then need to do the testing. Mr. Godinho indicated that <br /> January 27, <br /> the letter from the Environmental Health Division t1, 2requires <br /> 0 ureads that the conhe testing was ditions of approval, <br /> 2000, and that the updated letter dated October <br /> dated January 27, 2000, still apply, so his supervisor who put the letter together still wants the <br /> testing done. Mr. Mettler indicated thastewater in <br /> at they are i�ttlelcul MsgMettler only SQfogmed staffallons of vthat she had <br /> a year. Mr. Godinho agreed that It was very <br /> contacted Fran Focus of White Slougunan a asked ifr. Ms Metdid <br /> tle npuabove <br /> t abouground <br /> t 3 bar ellswater <br /> o f pumice <br /> system if they could handle that amisposal <br /> ok p Y <br /> vineyard. <br /> is <br /> back into the vine Y <br /> d <br />