SU0004378 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

._ w Mr. Martin asked Mr. Godinho if'the"Health Department would approve on site disposal of wastewater, and if the Building Department were to say that portable toilets were okay would. that eliminate the requirement for a soil suitability study/nitrate loading study. Mr. Godinho said- that aidthat it would eliminate the perk test.' Mr. Godinho indicated that he would talk to his supervisor, Mr. Borges, and ask him to contact the Mettlers regarding the testing. Mr. Godinho and the Mettlers discussed the well requirements. Mr. Martin reviewed the applicant's request to revise the Use Permit. Mr. Martin indicated that when the ,project was referred out the request to delete the soil suitability studylnitrate loading " study was not included, it was not'part of the project description. -If it is-determined that the condition can be changed and the'Mettlers want to do so, then the project may need to be stopped and redo the initial study to include the change-in the project description. Mr. Godinho w1 asked if we could wait till Monday so he may talk to Mr. Borges and get back to the project planner. Mr. Martin indicated yes. Mr.'Martin discussed the drainage issue. Mr. Martin informed the applicants that it.may not be necessary to have'a registered civil engineer or architect prepare the site plan, and asked the applicants to check with Mr. Rock in the Building Division. ` 11:00 a.m. 4.' SITE APPROVAL'APPLICATION NO. SA-01-71 OF ERLINDA LM HERNANDEZ (CIO SEVERIANO ARROYO). A Site Approval application to establish auto sales at an existing auto repair facility and a second phase to add a 480 square foot shop addition. ,There will be 15 cars for sale-and 15 cars for repair. Located at the isoutfieasf comer of Waterloo and Golden Gate Avenue, east-of Stockton (APN: 143-130-24; 3012 E. ' Waterloo Road, Stockton). Leanne Mueller, Associate Planner; Vicente-Hernandez, owner; Severiano Arroyo; applicant; 1. Rick Matuska, Code Enforcement Officer were present for this item..._ Ms. Mueller introduced the project. Y . f Mr. Hernandez indicated that the previous Site,Approval No. SA-98-32-did not expire. Ms. Mueller informed the'applicant that the research that`she has done indicates that Mr. Hernandez did not meet all the conditions of approval in the required time frame,tbecause it expired on— December 21, 1999..Ms. Mueller indicated yes, the wall condition was met but there were other conditions like the landscaping and striping of the parking spaces that were not. Mr. Hernandez stated that they were not required in the conditions. Ms..Mueller.stated that they were. W Mr. Hernandez stated that the fence was built before December of 1999.. Ms.' Mueller agreed r. Mr. Hernandez indicated that' he spoke with Mr.,Luoma :regarding the landscaping: <• Mr. Hernandez informed staff that there was a contamination leak'on the property that took about a'; year to.clean up;and the soil was tested by.the Environmental Health Division. Mr. Hernandez stated that he is not constructing a building.,Mr. Martin asked if Improvement. Plans were submitted and approved -for the 'first application. ' Ms' Mueller stated that Improvement Plans were submitted. Mr. Martin asked if the Improvement Plan was approved:; ; Ms. Mueller informed Mr. Martin that it was double stamped and Mr. Farano approved it. Me:. Martin asked if the Business License was issued. Ms. Mueller indicated that there was a