Laserfiche WebLink
Ifto, ./ <br /> 31 August 2004 <br /> AGE-NC Project No.04-1188 <br /> Page 22 of 24 <br /> • There were no obvious indications of stained soil or burned and distressed vegetation noted <br /> _ on the subject property. <br /> • AGE noted no evidence of the current or past use of ASTs, USTs or fill pipes for USTs on <br /> either of the parcels, or in the residential complex. <br /> There were no items of apparent environmental concern noted on the subject property at the time of <br /> .. the site visit except use of the subject property for agricultural purposes. AGE has no direct <br /> knowledge that and subsurface contamination of the subject property has occurred. <br /> 8.0. SAMPLING AND RESULTS <br /> No sampling was done for this investigation. <br /> 9.0. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> We have performed an investigation into the current and historical uses of the property located at <br /> 16000 & 16480 South Wing Levee, Tracy, California, the subject property. San Joaquin County <br /> Ordinance 9 905.12(a)was used as a guideline to perform this assessment. <br /> This assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection <br /> with the property except: <br /> • The extended period of use of the subject property for as long as 90 years for agricultural <br /> purposes provides the potential for the property to have been impacted by agricultural <br /> chemicals, such as herbicides, pesticides and fertilizers. However, AGE did not note any <br /> direct indications of unusual or dangerous use of chemicals on the property,such as unusual <br /> staining, chemical wastes or container disposal on the site, chemical storage or dumping, <br /> spilled powders, discolored or stained soil or stressed vegetation. <br /> • According the property owner, agricultural chemicals were not stored on the property; <br /> records seem to show that regular applications of maintenance agricultural chemicals were <br /> applied under permit in spring, summer and fall. <br /> • Of the chemicals used, only one was restricted, LANNATE 90SP, a Class I pesticide <br /> restricted for toxicity, but with no suspected teratogen, carcinogenic or mutagenic (TCM) <br /> effects.Because of' in water.and low affinity for soil binding, LANNATE <br /> 90SP may havU tential for groundwater contamination. LANNATE 90SP is rapidly <br /> degraded by soil microbes; it is not expecte to be fourid"�in heated soil after the growing <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br />