My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0005060 SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WOODBRIDGE
>
5500
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0500109
>
SU0005060 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:31:27 AM
Creation date
9/9/2019 11:11:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0005060
PE
2622
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0500109
STREET_NUMBER
5500
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
WOODBRIDGE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
APN
01116001
ENTERED_DATE
5/26/2005 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
5500 W WOODBRIDGE RD
RECEIVED_DATE
5/24/2005 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\W\WOODBRIDGE\5500\PA-0500109\SU0005060\SS STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> may' <br /> --- - r f <br /> Figure 3: Perspective View of Textile Filter Unit and System <br /> Textile filters have been configured in several different recirculating "modes," some of which optimize <br /> nitrogen reduction. A configuration that has produced excellent nitrogen removal is shown in Figure 5. <br /> Effluent quality from the system in the Lapine, Oregon, (see case study on following page) is indicative <br /> of the treatment quality achieved with this mode of operation. <br /> Textile Filter System Case Studies <br /> Burnett, Washington <br /> A textile filter system followed by a polishing sand filter was installed in November, 1998, at a single <br /> family home in Burnett as part of the National Onsite Demonstration Project(NODP) for the community <br /> of Burnett. This treatment system was configured (Figure 4) to meet Washington State's Treatment <br /> s <br /> Standard 1, which includes BOD and TSS less than I0 mg/L and fecal coliform count of les than 200 <br /> per 100 milliliters. A small polishing sand filter using a clean "mason"type sand(effective size =0.19 <br /> mm)was installed after the textile filter to ensure the system meets the fecal coliform requirement. <br /> Although the test results have shown the fecal requirement is being met by the textile filter itself, <br /> effluent from other textile filters have not produced this level of fecal removal. Weekly testing for eight <br /> weeks in the spring of 1999 produced the following results: <br /> Burnett, WA Flow BODS TSS TKN NO3-n TN FC <br /> gpd mg/L mg/L mg/L mg1L mg/L MPN/100 In, <br /> Textile Filter Effluent 130 3 1 3 16 19 3 <br /> Polishing Filter Effluent 130 3 2 2 12 14 3 <br /> In addition to the Burnett site, demonstration textile filter systems in Rhode Island, Minnesota, and <br /> Oregon have been installed with small polishing sand filters or sand-filled trenches to "disinfect"the <br /> final effluent instead of traditional methods such as chlorine, UV, or ozone. The polishing sand filters <br /> are more reliable, less energy intensive,and require far less maintenance than the traditional methods. <br /> Problems associated with traditional disinfection methods on small wastewater systems include <br /> NTP-FLT-TR0-ESB-HLB-1 <br /> 20 <br /> Page 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.