My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0012431
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Z
>
ZUCKERMAN
>
1101
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-1900158
>
SU0012431
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:35:45 AM
Creation date
9/9/2019 11:17:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0012431
PE
2664
FACILITY_NAME
PA-1900158
STREET_NUMBER
1101
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
ZUCKERMAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95219-
APN
12931012
ENTERED_DATE
7/16/2019 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
1101 N ZUCKERMAN RD
RECEIVED_DATE
7/23/2019 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TSok
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\Z\ZUCKERMAN\1101\PA-1900158\SU0012431\APPL.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
m <br /> Pacific Gas and Electric Company <br /> 2151 S.Orange Ave. <br /> Fresno,CA 93725 <br /> Description of the Proposed Project <br /> Pacific, Gas and Electric (PG&E) performed a consequence-based facility siting study (FSS) for the <br /> McDonald Island gas storage facility. The purpose of study was to perform an in-depth analysis of the site <br /> to identify potential risks and provide possible mitigation solutions. <br /> The findings of this study identified a potential life safety issue for on-site personnel working within the light <br /> wood construction trailers located at the site. Several of these trailers are purposely located within close <br /> proximity of the compressor station so that maintenance personnel are able to keep direct line of site on the <br /> operating equipment, allowing them to quickly react in case of trouble. However, being in close proximity of <br /> the station presents an explosion-based risk for these employees, as these trailers are not adequately <br /> designed to sustain the expected blast loads if there was a catastrophic event at the site. Furthermore, this <br /> puts PG&E out of compliance with API Recommended Practice 753 - "Management of Hazard Associated <br /> with location of Process Plant Portable Buildings. Therefore, the proposed project addresses this identified <br /> risk by replacing the existing light wood trailers with blast resistant modular buildings ((1) 40'x48' modular <br /> for open office space and (1) 36'x40' modular for conference room) designed to withstand the blast loads <br /> that would be expected in the case of an event. <br /> Findin s <br /> 1. There is good and sufficient cause for the Flood Variance. <br /> The natural gas storage facility at McDonald Island is one of only three such facilities located within <br /> PG&E's service territory. This facility is made up of a complex system of highly pressurized piping and <br /> equipment. In to ensure the safest and most reliable operation for this facility possible, PG&E personnel <br /> are staffed at this location 24-hours a day, 7 days a week. Having personnel located at this facility <br /> around the clock is imperative to ensure that any emergent operational issues can be addressed in the <br /> quickest manner possible. However, our employees working at this facility are currently exposed to an <br /> unmitigated hazard described in the 'Project Description' section of this document. This hazard has to <br /> be mitigated in order to eliminate the risk to staff working at the facility. In order to accomplish this, the <br /> project proposes installing blast-resistant modular buildings (BRMs). These BRMs are engineered to <br /> withstand the blast loads that would be expected at the site in the case of a catastrophic event. In <br /> addition, these units come fully engineered and substantially constructed,which would allow them to be <br /> put into use quickly, thereby allowing this risk to be eliminated as soon as possible. <br /> If a flood plain variance is not issued, the explosion-based risk that currently exists on the site will still <br /> need to be addressed. This will most likely require the construction of a platform in order to elevate the <br /> structures above the base flood elevation. The design, permitting and construction time associated with <br /> placing such a structure on the site will dramatically increase the duration of the project, thereby leaving <br /> onsite employees exposed to this hazard. Therefore, it is PG&Es belief that there is good and sufficient <br /> cause to grant this flood plain variance in order to mitigate this risk in the most expeditious manner <br /> possible. <br /> "PG&E"refers to Pacific Gas and Electric Company a subsidiary of PG&E Corporation. 1 of 2 <br /> ©2016 Pacific Gas and Electric Company.All rights reserved. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.