Laserfiche WebLink
Page 1 of 1 <br /> Frank Girardi [EH] <br /> From: Haeck, Gary[Gary.Haeck@stantee.com] <br /> Sent: Wednesday,August 19, 2009 1:00 PM <br /> To: Frank Girard![EH] <br /> Cc: Margaret Lagorio[EH]; Braybrooks, Larry <br /> Subject: Requesting quick TAT on Boring Permits for Lodi Energy Center PEA <br /> Attachments: LEC PEA Workplan thru Appendix B.pdf <br /> Greetings Frank, I wanted to facilitate as quick a turn-around as possible on the boring permits for an upcoming PEA. The <br /> City of Lodi,the Northern California Power Authority(NCPA), bWR,and a variety of other partners are in the process of <br /> constructing (under California Energy Center(CEC)oversight)a 300 megawatt power station (LEC)on a 4.4 acre portion of <br /> San Joaquin County APN 055-130-16 in Lodi,California. The LEC will go in next to the existing White Slough <br /> Water Pollution Control Facility(WPCF). I believe one of my Staff Geologists,Larry Braybrooks,has had some <br /> initial discussions with you in this regard. <br /> Phase I and IIs have documented some shallow PAH soil impacts and the CEC has asked DTSC to provide <br /> oversight on completion of a PEA at the Site. The issue is the very aggressive schedule required to begin <br /> construction on time. We just finished compressed negotiations with DTSC on the Voluntary Cleanup Agreement <br /> (VCA) and its schedule. The aggressive schedule became even more aggressive and DTSC has even agreed to <br /> shorten its typical review times for various steps along the way including allowing a final workplan to be submitted <br /> in lieu of a draft. The workplan, SAP, SSP, and QAPP(over 600 pages)were submitted to DTSC on Friday 8-14- <br /> 09. When DTSC sends its approval letter,we have 42 days to complete the investigation,prepare the PEA, <br /> including the risk assessment. For all the hoopla involved in the project it is a relatively simple scope of work. <br /> Twenty direct pushihand auger borings to 6.5 feet bgs, four similar background borings, and sampling an existing <br /> monitoring well. Depth to groundwater at the time of investigation will range from 10 12 feet bgs. <br /> My objective with this email is to facilitate as quick a turn around as possible on receipt of the boring permits. We <br /> cannot meet this schedule,if we have to wait a week for boring permits. In the past SJCEHD has been very <br /> cooperative in facilitating quick turn arounds on certain projects with quick schedules. What I would propose is that <br /> we submit a completed application with all permit, MFR, and oversight fees, along with a PDF of the Workplan,to <br /> start the process. When we get the approval letter from DTSC, I will email a PDF and follow up with a hard copy. <br /> I would like to discuss this approach with you and determine if you also need copies of the SAP, SSP,and QAPP, or <br /> other information and what approximate TAT we might expect. This will allow me to move forward with <br /> contracting and scheduling the driller for ASAP after receipt of DTSCs approval letter and permits from SJCEHD. <br /> Thanks for your cooperation. Please give a call to discuss at your convenience if necessary. <br /> Gary <br /> Gary D.Haeck,Ph.D.,P.G. <br /> Managing Senior Geologist <br /> Stantec <br /> 3017 Kilgore Road Suite 1€10 <br /> Rancho Cordova CA 95670 <br /> Ph: (916)384-0768 <br /> Fx: (916)861-0430 <br /> Cell:(530)400-0362 <br /> Cary.Haeck@Stantec.com <br /> stantec.com <br /> The content of this email is the confidential property of Stantec and should not be copied,modified,retransmitted,or used for any purpose <br /> except with Stanteds written authorization. If you are not the intended recipient,please delete all copies and notify us immediately. <br /> t Please consider the environment before printing this email. <br /> 8/27/2009 <br />