Laserfiche WebLink
5.13 VISUAL RESOURCES <br /> The LEC would expand the visible presence of industrial facilities in this view. However, <br /> the facility would be entirely within an already existing industrial envelope, adjacent to the <br /> STIG plant and near the large transmission towers that already appear as prominent vertical <br /> elements in the landscape. And although a segment of the coast range,visible in <br /> background views,would be obscured by the LEC, substantial portions of the distant <br /> mountains are already blocked in this view by existing structures. The majority of the LEC <br /> would be comparable in scale with the existing STIG plant structures,with only the new <br /> exhaust stack appearing as taller than the existing STIG stack. The WPCF ponds and <br /> agricultural land would remain prominent in foreground views. Because the new features <br /> would not remove any valued elements of the view,would not block views of valued <br /> features in the background,and would not substantially change the composition of this <br /> view,there will be essentially no change to the view's existing levels of vividness,unity,and <br /> intactness,and overall level of visual quality. As a consequence,the change in view from <br /> this KOP would not be substantial. <br /> 5.13.2.4.2 KOP 2—View from White Slough Wildlife Area <br /> Figure 5.13-3 presents a photo of the existing view toward the project site from within the <br /> WSWA,approximately one mile northwest of the project site (Photo A),a simulation of the <br /> view as it would appear during the project's operational period (Photo B), and a simulation <br /> of the view as it would appear with proposed landscaping, after five years (Photo C). <br /> Comparison of the first two images indicates that when the proposed project is in place,the <br /> change to the view will not be substantial. The existing STIG plant stack and some of the <br /> buildings are visible from KOP 2,as are portions of the WPCF. The LEC would not expand <br /> the horizontal extent of the industrial area already apparent in current views. The exhaust <br /> stack would be noticeably taller than the STIG stack from this vantage point,but it would <br /> appear shorter than the nearest transmission tower. In addition,from this viewpoint,the <br /> new exhaust stack would appear to be within the corridor of the existing transmission <br /> alignment. Because no elements of the LEC would appear outside of the industrial envelope <br /> visible in the existing view, and because there would be no marked change in the existing <br /> levels of vividness,unity or intactness,changes to the overall visual quality in the existing <br /> view from this KOP would not be substantial. <br /> 5.13.2.4.3 KOP 3—View from Eight Mile Road <br /> Figure 5.13-4 presents a photo of the existing view toward the project site from a viewpoint <br /> approximately 2 miles south of the LEC site, along the westbound shoulder of Eight Mile <br /> Road (Photo A), a simulation of the view as it would appear during the project's operational <br /> period (Photo B), and a simulation of the view as it would appear with proposed <br /> landscaping, after five years (Photo C). Comparison of the two images indicates that when <br /> the proposed project is in place,the change to the view will be relatively small. The cooling <br /> tower and,above it, the exhaust stack would be clearly visible in the distance,adjacent to <br /> the existing STIG plant. The LEC would be near the existing transmission lines in the area <br /> and therefore,while taller than other nearby structures,would appear as part of a corridor <br /> with other taller vertical elements in the landscape. As with the view from KOP 2,the <br /> horizontal area occupied by industrial facilities in the existing view would not expand with <br /> inclusion of the LEC. These changes would do little to alter the existing character of the <br /> view. The visual vividness and unity of the existing view is based on the dominance of <br /> agricultural land in the fore-and middleground, and construction of the LEC would not <br /> substantially alter the intactness of the view. Thus,there would be no substantial change to <br /> 5.13-24 SAC/371322/082350001(LEC_5.13_VISUAL.DOC) <br />