Laserfiche WebLink
CONTENTS <br /> 3.5-1 Design and Construction LORS for the Proposed Transmission Line and <br /> Substations................................................................................................................3-10 <br /> 3.5-2 Electric and Magnetic Field LORS.........................................................................3-11 <br /> 3.5-3 Hazardous Shock LORS..........................................................................................3-11 <br /> 3.5-4 Communications Interference LORS ....................................................................3-12 <br /> 3.5-5 Aviation Safety LORS..............................................................................................3-12 <br /> 3.5-6 Fire Hazard LORS....................................................................................................3-13 <br /> 3.5-7 National,State, and Local Agencies with Jurisdiction over Applicable LORS3-13 <br /> 5.1-1 San Joaquin Valley Attainment Status.................................................................5.1-4 <br /> 5.1-2 Ambient Air Quality Standards............................................................................5.1-7 <br /> 5.1-3 Ozone Levels at Stockton-Hazelton,Stockton,1998-2007, (parts per million)5.1-8 <br /> 5.1-4 Nitrogen Dioxide Levels at Stockton-Hazelton,Stockton, 1998-2007, <br /> (parts per million).................................................................................................5.1-10 <br /> 5.1-5 Carbon Monoxide Levels at Stockton-Hazelton,Stockton, 1998-2007, <br /> (parts per million).................................................................................................5.1-12 <br /> 5.1-6 Sulfur Dioxide Levels at Bethel Island,1998-2007(parts per million)..........5.1-14 <br /> 5.1-7 Particulate Sulfate Levels in Bakersfield, 1995-2002 <br /> (micrograms per cubic meter).............................................................................5.1-15 <br /> 5.1-8 PMlo Levels at Stockton-Hazelton,Stockton, 1998-2007 (µg/m3)..................5.1-16 <br /> 5.1-9 PM2.5 Levels Stockton-Hazelton,Stockton, 1998-2007 (µg/m3)......................5.1-18 <br /> 5.1-10 Airborne Lead at Stockton-Hazelton,Stockton,1998-2003(µg/m3) ..............5.1-20 <br /> 5.1-11 New GE 7FA Combustion Turbine/HRSG Design Specifications................5.1-21 <br /> 5.1-12 New Auxiliary Boiler Design Specifications.....................................................5.1-21 <br /> 5.1-13 Nominal Fuel Properties-Natural Gas............................................................5.1-22 <br /> 5.1-14 Potential to Emit for Existing NCPA Lodi Equipment....................................5.1-22 <br /> 5.1-15 Quarterly and Annual Operations for the CTG and HRSG............................5.1-23 <br /> 5.1-16 Daily,Quarterly and Annual Operations for the Auxiliary Boiler................5.1-23 <br /> 5.1-17 Hourly,Daily and Annual Heat Input for the New Combustion Units.......5.1-24 <br /> 5.1-18 Maximum Emission Rates-Combustion Turbine/HRSG.............................5.1-25 <br /> 5.1-19 Maximum CTG Startup and Shutdown Emission Rates.................................5.1-26 <br /> 5.1-20 Maximum Emission Rates-Auxiliary Boiler...................................................5.1-26 <br /> 5.1-21 Criteria Pollutant Emissions from New Equipment........................................5.1-27 <br /> 5.1-22 Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New Equipment..........................................5.1-28 <br /> 5.1-23 Maximum Proposed TAC Emissions for the CTG/HRSG .............................5.1-29 <br /> 5.1-24 Total HAP Emissions from the Facility After Modification...........................5.1-29 <br /> 5.1-25 BACT Determinations for LEC...........................................................................5.1-32 <br /> 5.1-26 Results of Turbine Screening Procedure: Turbine Operating Conditions <br /> Producing Maximum Modeled Ambient Impacts by Pollutant and <br /> AveragingPeriod..................................................................................................5.1-38 <br /> 5.1-27 Summary of Results from Refined Modeling Analysis for <br /> PermittedSources.................................................................................................5.1-40 <br /> 5.1-28 Highest Reported Background Concentrations in the Project Area..............5.1-40 <br /> 5.1-29 Modeled Maximum Impacts Plus Background................................................5.1-41 <br /> 5.1-30 Modeled Maximum Impacts During Commissioning of the CTG/HRSG...5.1-42 <br /> 5.1-31 PSD Class II Increments.......................................................................................5.1-45 <br /> 5.1-32 District BACT Emission Thresholds...................................................................5.1-51 <br /> SAC/371322/082490010(LEC_CONTENTS.DOC) x <br />