My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
THORNTON
>
12751
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0528038
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2019 9:35:34 AM
Creation date
9/26/2019 9:33:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0528038
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0018998
FACILITY_NAME
NCPA LODI ENERGY CENTER
STREET_NUMBER
12751
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
THORNTON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95242
APN
05513016
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
12751 N THORNTON RD
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Stantec <br /> PEA WORKPLAN <br /> Proposed Lodi Energy Center Site <br /> Lodi, California <br /> 7.0 SELECTION OF SCREENING CRITERIA <br /> Based on the results of the scoping meeting, a few modifications to the standard PEA <br /> requirements are proposed. These include utilizing exposure point concentrations (EPCs) <br /> based on the 95 percent upper confidence limit (UCL) of the mean (rather than maximum <br /> concentrations) for comparisons with risk-based screening levels based on industrial worker <br /> (rather than residential) exposure assumptions. In addition, the soil sample metals results will <br /> be compared with existing background data using a Wilcoxon-Rank Sum or similar test. EPCs <br /> will be generated for each exposure area using US EPA Pro-UCL Version 4.0 software. For <br /> organic compounds detected at least once in an exposure area and for metals and PAHs <br /> exceeding background levels, the ratio of the EPCs to the screening-level criteria will be <br /> calculated for each analyte as a measure of risk. Cumulative risk will be calculated for both <br /> carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic effects, using the screening criteria accepted by DTSC. <br /> Stantec proposes to compare soil analytical data to the following risk-based screening criteria <br /> using a hierarchical approach in the order listed below: <br /> • California Human Health Screening Levels (CHHSLs)for commercial/industrial land use; <br /> • USEPA Regional Screening Levels (RSLs) for industrial soil; and <br /> • Where a CHHSL or RSL screening value does not exist, detected concentrations will be <br /> compared to San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board Environmental <br /> Screening Levels (ESLs) Shallow Soil Screening Levels (< 3 meters bgs), <br /> Commercial/Industrial land use where groundwater is not a current or potential drinking <br /> water source. <br /> Stantec proposes to compare groundwater analytical data to California Maximum Contaminant <br /> Levels (MCLs). <br /> PEA WP-Lodi 16 August 13,2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.