Laserfiche WebLink
t03 February 2006 <br /> • AGE-NC Project No 98-0533 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> the wells to achieve a minimum 80% recovery of the pre-purge water volume The samples were <br /> transferred into laboratory-supplied 40-m1 EPA-approved volatile organic analysis (VOA) vials <br /> containing 0 5 ml 18% hydrochloric acid as a sample preservative The sample vials were then <br /> labeled with the monitoring well designation,date, time of sampling and the sampler's initials The <br /> samples were transported in a chilled container under chain of custody to Cal Tech Environmental <br /> Laboratories (CTEL) for analysis The samples were analyzed for <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as aviation gasoline (TPH-ag) in accordance with <br /> EPA Method 5030/8015M, <br /> • Benzene,toluene,ethylbenzene and xylene(BTEX)and methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE) <br /> in accordance with EPA Method 80-21Y �J ice. <br /> • Fuel oxygenates - tertiary butanol (TBA), di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tert-butyl ether <br /> (ETBE), tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME), and MTBE in accordance with EPA Method <br /> 8260B, and <br /> • Ethylene dibromide (EDB) and 1,2 dichloroethane (1,2 DCA) in accordance with EPA <br /> method 8260 <br /> • <br /> At the request of the EHD,a ground water sample from the on-site domestic well was also collected <br /> and analyzed To ensure that formation water was being produced, water was allowed to run out of <br /> the well for approximately 20 minutes,which was long enough to automatically turn the well pump <br /> on Ground water was poured directly into the 40-m1 VOA vials from a valve at the well head <br /> 3.0. FINDINGS <br /> 1 Ground water eley4tion, ground water gradient and flow direction were determined from field data, <br /> ground water vi-ere assessed by laboratory analysis of ground water samples <br /> 3 1 GROUND WATER GRADIENT AND tOW DIRECTION <br />' The elevation of ground water in each of thethree monitoring wells was calculated by subtracting <br /> the depth to ground water from the su eyed relative casing elevations (Table 1) Depths to ground <br /> water ranged from 80 71 feet to 81 feet bsg for an average of 80 96 feet bsg Depth to ground <br />' water increased an average o 0 3 feet since the previous monitcglng event in September 2005 <br /> Ground water elevations at the site ranged from 23 96 feet (MWto 24 10 feet (MW-3) below <br />' mean sea level The ground water gradient was calculated to be 0 001 ft/ft directed towards the <br /> • northeast Figure 3 illustrates the contoured ground water elevations as measured on 02 December <br /> 2005 <br /> 1 <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br /> 1 ' <br />