Laserfiche WebLink
0/LDC -3- 13 July 1987 <br /> It was agreed that EC, pH, TDS and any contaminants detected in on- <br /> site monitoring wells should be analyzed in off-site well waters. <br /> Ground Water <br /> We commented that wellhead reference point elevations reported to <br /> date are very inconsistent. There is an apparent shift in the <br /> gradient of over 900. JHK maintains that the survey problem has <br /> been rectified, and that there is no shifting gradient when <br /> calculations are made on the baseline survey map. It was agreed <br /> that this conclusion would be discussed at a later date, and that <br /> accurate maps showing well locations, depth to water measurements, <br /> static water surface elevations, reference point elevations and <br /> water table gradient for each monitoring period would be included in <br /> the HAR. <br /> Deeper wells must be drilled to fully define the vertical extent of <br /> the uppermost water-bearing unit and the contamination therein. If <br /> the bottom of the uppermost water-bearing strata is found to be <br /> contaminated, analysis of the next underlying water-bearing unit may <br /> be necessary. Deeper wells are also necessary to determine vertical <br /> components of ground water flow. <br /> Little agreement was reached on the need for additional wells. A <br /> well will be constructed immediately below the SI after excavation <br /> of the wastes. The possibility of perforating this well throughout <br /> the entire thickness of the upper water-bearing unit and using <br /> packers to take discrete samples was discussed. <br /> It was reported that the ongoing ground water monitoring program has <br /> been expanded, as of April 1987, to include EC, TS and standard <br /> minerals. <br /> Slug tests, along with lab permeability tests, are proposed for <br /> determination of the aquifer hydraulic conductivity and storage <br /> coefficient. The limitations of these tests were discussed. The <br /> usefulness of pumping tests was discussed, as was the problem of <br /> disposal of contaminated water from such tests. No agreement was <br /> reached on methods of defining aquifer properties. <br /> Monitoring System <br /> It was agreed that grain size analysis would be run on aquifer <br /> materials from the monitoring wells to justify screen slot size and <br /> filter pack choices. A composite sample of the screened interval <br /> will be used for this analysis. <br />