COMPLIANCE INFO - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

LAW OFFICES OF WILLIA'K 3. SCHUCE-�N WILLIAM A. SCHUCKMAN 3031 WEST MARCH LANE TE_EPHONE (2091 472-IICC FAX (209) a72-1079 SUITE 123 SOUTH JUDITH A. FEINBERG c=RTIFIeo RPRPLEGAL STOC=ON. CALIFORNIA 95219-6500 May 16, 2000 David J. Irev Via Facsimile Transmittal Deputy District Attorney Environmental Prosecutions Unit Post Office Box 990 Stockton, CA 95201 Re: People vs. Eddie's Pizza Cafe. et al. - - San Joaquin Superior Court No: CV 008909 Dear Mr. Irey: Thank you for your fax dated May 16, 2000. 1. Apparently I misunderstood your fax dated flay 9, 2000. 1 interpreted your demand that all correspondence to you be in writing to mean that under circumstances where notice would ordinarily be by phone (such as notice of ex-parte applications) you required a writing, a writing that could only be provided by fax. Perhaps my misunderstanding was reinforced by your failure to return my numerous phone calls. I will comply with any phone notice requirements by phoning you. If you are unavailable, I will leave them with your receptionist. Please be sure he or she forwards all messages to you immediately. 2. I am unaware of more than one case against these defendants as only one case is_ referenced in your Tette: dated tilav 9, 2000, to Mr. Ellis. On tilay 8. 1-000. I wrote you concerning CV 008909. If your response dated May 9, 2000, was with respect to other cases. it did not so state. �- Please immediately provide me with the case numbers of the other two cases you have filed and with your proof of service of the Summons and Complaint on each defendant. If those cases have been filed but not served, this office will accept service by fax. 3. A pleading that is vague and ambiguous is subject to attack by special demurrer, CCP § 430.10(f). Normally such a demurrer is not necessary as the attorneys can resolve an ambiguity LLLL informally. Unfortunately,you have ignored at least five attempts by this office to reach an informal resolution.