Laserfiche WebLink
' LAW OFFICES OF <br /> r WILLIA-M A. SCHIICMNM-'L v <br /> David J. Irey Page 2 <br /> May 16, 2000 <br /> Your pleading alleges three inconsistent quantities of carbon dioxide which you claim give <br /> rise to various requirements. <br /> As I am sure you are aware,H& S Code § 6382(a)requires that a substance is not hazardous <br /> (and thus will not trigger a safety-plan requirement) unless it is in a physical state, volume or <br /> concentration effecting health. Thus, without knowing what quantity you are alleging, I cannot <br /> ascertain whether Carbon Dioxide is a hazardous substance as allegedly handled by the defendants. <br /> Without your specifying what quantity is alleged,the defendant cannot relate your allegation <br /> to the quantity that by law or regulation triggers a safety-plan requirement. <br /> The defendants raise this issue for good reason as the notices provided to them by the <br /> Government prior to your lawsuit quantified the Carbon Dioxide in pounds and alleged that <br /> defendants' handling of quantities far less than 500 pounds triggered the requirement. Your <br /> complaint alleges that the quantity handled by the defendants exceeded 500 pounds and is <br /> inconsistent with the facts as previously alleged by the Government. <br /> Compounding the deficiency of your pleading is your failure to allege that whatever quantity <br /> You claim the defendants handled met the § 6382 threshold, thus failing to allege a violation of law <br /> and causing the complaint to be demurrable under CCP § 430.1(e). <br /> This entire matter may simply and easily be resolved by your stating which quantity you are <br /> alleging and that such a quantity was in such a physical state, volume or quantity that it meets the <br /> 6382 threshold. If you are alleging that handling any of the three quantities triggers the <br /> requirement regardless of whether that quantity effects health,just tell me that in writing and we can <br /> proceed accordingly. '- <br /> Separately, my client denies that he reneged on any settlement. The offer as he understood <br /> it was to settle a disputed claim on a walkawav basis. Apparently you then attempted to change the <br /> deal by requiring a judgment. If you have documentation to the contrary (such as a written offer <br /> including the proposal for a judgment) please provide it to me immediately. <br /> Yours very truly, --_i <br /> WILLIAM A. SCHUCKMAN <br /> WAS/jf <br /> CC: Mr. George Badway <br />