Laserfiche WebLink
Potential) Less Than Less Than Analyzed <br /> Si nificant Significant with Significant No In The <br /> 9 Mitigation 9 <br /> Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Prior EIR <br /> XII. MINERAL RESOURCES. <br /> Would the project: <br /> a) Result in the loss of availability of a known-mineral <br /> resource that would be of value to the region and the ❑ ❑ <br /> residents of the state? <br /> b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important <br /> mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local ❑ ❑ <br /> general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? <br /> Impact Discussion: <br /> a-b) The proposed project, a revisions of approved actions for a previously approved expansion to an existing religious <br /> assembly will not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource of a resource recovery site because the <br /> site does not contain minerals of significance or known mineral resources. San Joaquin County applies a mineral <br /> resource zone (MRZ) designation to land that meets the significant mineral deposits definition by the State Division of <br /> Mines and Geology. The project site in Stockton has been classified as MRZ-1. The San Joaquin County General <br /> Plan 2035 Volume II, Chapter 10-Mineral Resources,Table 10-7, defines MRZ-1 as"Areas where adequate <br /> information indicates that no significant mineral deposits are present, or where it is judged that little likelihood exists <br /> for their presence."Therefore, the project will not result in the loss of mineral resources or mineral resource recovery <br /> sites within the region and in the Stockton community. <br /> PA-1800106 (RAA, UP)—Initial Study 21 <br />