My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0081062 SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MURRAY
>
2288
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SR0081062 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2019 5:06:41 PM
Creation date
11/6/2019 4:53:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SR0081062
PE
2602
STREET_NUMBER
2288
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
MURRAY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LINDEN
Zip
95236
APN
10510020,21
ENTERED_DATE
8/20/2019 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
2288 N MURRAY RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TSok
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6.7 Discussion of any potential problems predicted and/or the need for an engineered or <br /> alternative septic system. In this area,the soils are classified as Archerdale clay loam and Cogna <br /> loam. Due to this classification and percolation rate, a standard septic system would be <br /> recommended on subject parcel. <br /> 6.8 Discussion of percolation rates in relation to the type, size and location of future leach <br /> fields needed at the site. Based on the results of the percolation rate and the soils profile, it is <br /> Dillon&Murphy's opinion that the subject proposed parcels are suited for a typical on-site sewage <br /> disposal system. The systems should be properly designed and installed according to the current <br /> San Joaquin County criteria for standard septic systems. <br /> Based on the depth to groundwater in the area,and the size of the proposed parcels,it is our opinion <br /> on that the installation of any new proposed septic system, if property installed, should not <br /> adversely affect the quality of groundwater in the area. <br /> 7.0 CONCLUSION SECTION <br /> The conclusions of this report are based on the information provided regarding the proposed <br /> development,the use of the subject property, and the site conditions as they existed at the time we <br /> excavated our test hole and performed the percolation test. It was assumed that the test holes and <br /> percolation test results are representative of the subsurface conditions in the general area. <br /> Our services were performed, our findings obtained, and our conclusions proposed in accordance <br /> with generally accepted engineering principles and practices. The warranty is in lieu of all other <br /> warranties either expressed or implied. Test findings and statements of professional opinion do <br /> not constitute a guarantee or warranty, expressed or implied. <br /> Q�pFESS <br /> Q�O���C,tiUr,P,c \: J eM Murphy <br /> y <br /> C.E. 45277 <br /> w 2 <br /> 17 II� <br /> 1� f <br /> ryTF )F <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.