Laserfiche WebLink
1.0 INTRODUCTION <br /> The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region IX, under the authority of the <br /> Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) <br /> and the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA) has tasked Bechtel <br /> Environmental, Inc. to conduct a Site Inspection (SI) of the Busy Bee Laundry and Cleaning <br /> (Busy Bee) site in Lodi, San Joaquin County, California. <br /> The Busy Bee site was identified as a potential hazardous waste site and entered into the <br /> Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System <br /> (CERCLIS) on December 14, 1990 (CAD 982053944) (1). The site was entered into CERCLIS <br /> because of the presence of contaminants in groundwater detected by the City of Lodi (2). <br /> A Preliminary Assessment (PA)of the Busy Bee site was conducted for the EPA by Ecology and <br /> Environment, Inc. on August 8, 1991 (3). The purpose of the PA was to review existing <br /> information on the site and its environs to assess the threat(s), if any, posed to public health, <br /> welfare, or the environment and to determine if further action under CERCLA/SARA was <br /> warranted. <br /> After reviewing the PA, the EPA decided that further investigation of the Busy Bee site would be <br /> necessary to more completely evaluate the site using EPA's Hazard Ranking System (HRS) <br /> criteria. The HRS assesses the relative threat associated with actual or potential releases of <br /> hazardous substances at the site. The HRS has been adopted by the EPA to help set priorities for <br /> further evaluation and eventual remedial action at hazardous waste sites. The HRS is the primary <br /> method of determining a site's eligibility for placement on the National Priorities List (NPL). The <br /> NPL identifies sites at which EPA may conduct remedial response actions. This report <br /> summarizes the results of the SI investigation of the Busy Bee site. <br /> 1.1 Apparent Problem <br /> The apparent problem at the site is as follows: Busy Bee, a dry cleaning and laundry facility, uses <br /> the solvent tetrachloroethene, also known as perchloroethylene (PCE),in the dry cleaning process <br /> (4). As part of the dry cleaning process, separator water, which contains PCE, was probably <br /> discharged into the sewer between June 1985 and October 1988 from the Busy Bee facility (5). <br /> PCE concentration levels as high as 160 parts per billion (ppb) were detected in a municipal <br /> drinking water well (Well 3), located 0.4 mile downgradient of the Busy Bee site, by the City of <br /> Lodi in June 1989 (6). A soil gas survey indicated that the PCE ion counts as high as 240,000 <br /> were detected around the Busy Bee site. A sewer water sample collected downgradient of the site <br /> under ambient conditions indicated PCE concentrations of 700 ppb. (7) In a site-specific <br /> investigation by Luhdorff & Scalmanini (L&S), consulting engineers, PCE concentrations of <br /> 290 ppb and 4,400 ppb were detected in the soil and groundwater sample analyses, <br /> respectively (8). <br /> SI Busy Bee Laundry and Cleaning-0(F) • 1/93 1 Printed on 50% recycled paper. -� <br />