Laserfiche WebLink
MONITCWNG SYSTEM CERTIFOATION <br /> CERTIFICATION / TEST DATE: October 25, 2011 <br /> Al. FACILITY A2. OWNER <br /> Name BP#29 Cruisers Manteca Name Boyett Petroleum <br /> Address 1137 W. Lathrop Road, Manteca, CA 95336 Address 601 McHenry Avenue, Modesto, CA 95350 <br /> Phone# 209-824-2760 Phone# 209-577-6000 <br /> Contact Rohda Henry Contact Rohda Henry <br /> D. RESULTS OF TESTING / SERVICING <br /> Make / Model of Monitoring System: Veeder-Root TLS-350 <br /> Software Version Installed: 329.01 <br /> Complete the following checklist: <br /> ■ Yes ❑ No* Is the audible alarm operational? <br /> ■ Yes ❑ No* Is the visual alarm operational? <br /> ■ Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors visually inspected,functionally tested,and confirmed operational? <br /> ■ Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment <br /> will not interfere with their proper operation? <br /> ■ Yes ❑ No* If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station,is all communications equipment(e.g.modems) <br /> ❑ N/A operational? <br /> ■ Yes ❑ No* For pressurized piping systems,does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> ❑ N/A monitoring system detects a leak,fails to operate,or is electrically disconnected? If yes:which sensors initiate <br /> positive shutdown? (check all that apply) ■ Sump/Trench sensors: ■ Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> ■ Yes ❑ No* Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? <br /> ■ Yes ❑ No* For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device(i.e. no <br /> ❑ N/A mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed),is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br /> fill point(s)and operating properly? If so,at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? 90% <br /> ■ Yes* ❑ No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes,identify specific sensors,probes,or other equipment replaced <br /> and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E,below. <br /> ■ Yes* ❑ No Was any liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? <br /> (Check all that apply) ❑ Product; ■ Water. If yes,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> ■ Yes ❑ No* Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to insure proper settings? Attach set-up reports,if applicable. <br /> ■ Yes ❑ No* Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturers specifications? <br /> * In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. COMMENTS <br /> Replaced the 208 sensor in the Diesel fill sump <br /> Replaced the 304 brine sensor in the Diesel STP sump. <br /> This site has Veeder-Root 332175-001 smart sensors montoring the piping secondary. <br /> This site has Veeder-Root 079439040 sensors montoring the annular spaces on all UDC's and sumps. <br /> Removed 7.5 gallons of water from the 87 fill sump. <br /> Removed a small amount of water from the 91 fill and Diesel STP sump. <br /> 2011 Walton Engineering,Inc. <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br />