My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS_FILE 1
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAIN
>
800
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0539293
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS_FILE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2019 2:51:02 PM
Creation date
11/20/2019 2:45:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
FileName_PostFix
FILE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0539293
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0022465
FACILITY_NAME
VALLEY MOTORS
STREET_NUMBER
800
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
MAIN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
800 E MAIN
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A Grundfos®2-inch submersible pump was proposed for use. The proposed initial <br /> pumping rate was 0.5 gpm,with step wise increments of approximately 0.25 GPM until <br /> the maximum sustainable yield was achieved. That rate would then be used in the <br /> constant-rate test. <br /> The plan proposed processing the extracted water through three 55-gallon carbon <br /> canisters, collecting a treated sample for approval by the City of Stockton Sanitation <br /> District, and discharging into the City sewer system. After approval of the discharge <br /> permit,water extraction would resume and samples were to be collected at approximately <br /> 2-3,000-gallon intervals until termination of the test. <br /> 2.0 Step Test <br /> The Step test was performed May 13, 2009. The Grundfos®pump was lowered to a <br /> depth approximately 45 feet below the surface, or approximately 16 feet below the water <br /> table. Water was initially removed at a rate of approximately 0.75 gpm. Each hour,the <br /> rate was increased approximately 0.25 to 0.5 gpm. After nearly 6 hours, a stabilized rate <br /> of approximately 2.5 gpm was achieved. However, a lower rate of 1.25-1.5 gpm was <br /> selected for the subsequent constant-rate pumping test as a precautionary measure. <br /> After 332 gallons had been pumped into a 500-gallon storage tank, a baseline sample was <br /> collected. The test then resumed and an additional 148 gallons were pumped,bringing the <br /> total to 480 gallons in the 500-gallon storage tank(Table 1). A second water sample was <br /> then collected. <br /> The samples were transmitted to Excelchem Analytical. The first sample was analyzed <br /> for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in the gasoline range (TPH-g) and volatile aromatics <br /> (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene)by EPA method 8260B. The end-test <br /> sample was analyzed by EPA method 624 because that was required by the sewer <br /> discharge permit, and Trichloroethane (TCE) and Perchloroethane (PCE)were included <br /> in the analysis because chlorinated hydrocarbons had previously been detected in <br /> groundwater samples and the Sanitation District required verification of their <br /> concentration.. Lead analysis was performed by EPA 200.7. The laboratory report is in <br /> Appendix A, and the results are summarized in Table 2. <br /> The TPH-g concentration at the end of the test was about 18%higher than it was after the <br /> first 332 gallons had been pumped. Other concentrations were also generally higher, <br /> though by lesser amounts. <br /> Due to the detection of a total TCE/PCE concentration of 170µg/l (parts per billion), the <br /> Sanitation District rejected the request for continuous discharge of treated groundwater <br /> and required Valley Motors to submit a new application for batch discharge. A copy of <br /> this correspondence from the Sanitation District is in Appendix B. <br /> Because PCE was detected in the end-test sample, additional filtering was required to <br /> remove chlorinated hydrocarbons. A sample was collected after each filtering cycle and <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.