Laserfiche WebLink
The work plan, which,was submitted in March, proposed installing two 6-inch diameter <br /> extraction wells and screenipg them from 38 to 53 feet. During the subsequent pumping <br /> test, these two wells and VM-2 would be tested. This plan was approved by EHD in <br /> April. <br /> Due to financial reasons, Valley Motors was unable to proceed with the work for several <br /> months. During this time, groundwater monitoring continued, and in the Third Quarter <br /> 2008 Report we concluded that "In view of the stable groundwater flow direction and <br /> hydrocarbon plume and the State's current financial problems that are affecting the ability of <br /> Responsible Parties to receive reimbursement from the Underground Storage Tank Cleanup <br /> Fund,the most prudent course of action is to confine the scope of work to regular <br /> groundwater monitoring for the immediate future." <br /> In a letter dated October 9, EHD directed Valley Motors to proceed immediately with the <br /> groundwater extraction test as proposed in the March work plan. After conferring with <br /> Mr. O'Neill, Upgradient Environmental determined that it is financially impossible to <br /> proceed with that work plan. A letter dated November 12 was forwarded to EHD <br /> informing EHD of the financial situation. On February 6, a meeting was held at the EHD <br /> office to discuss future work. A modified groundwater extraction test was agreed to. <br /> Therefore, Mr. O'Neill has directed Upgradient Environmental to implement the <br /> recommendation made in the Fourth Quarter 2006 Report: perform a limited extraction <br /> test on monitoring well VM-2 only. In accordance with that recommendation, a plan to <br /> conduct a groundwater extraction test in VM-2 is described in the following paragraphs. <br /> 2.0 PROPOSED PUMPING TEST <br /> 1) A 500 to 1,000 gallon storage tank will be mobilized to the site and temporarily 10 <br /> connected to VM-2. <br /> 2) A water sample will be collected from the well to establish a baseline <br /> concentration. The sample will be preserved in a cooled ice chest for later <br /> analysis. <br /> 3) A downhole pump will be lowered into the well and the well will be pumped at an <br /> initial rate of 0.5 gallon per minute(GPM). If the well is able to sustain this rate <br /> without excessive drawdown, the rate will be increased in step-wise fashion in <br /> increments of approximately 0.25 GPM until the maximum sustainable yield is <br /> achieved. This rate will then be used in the constant-rate test, which will continue <br /> until the drawdown has stabilized or become asymptotic. A second water sample <br /> will be collected at this time: <br /> 4) Contaminated water will be processed through three 55-gallon carbon canisters <br /> and discharged into the City sewer system. To satisfy disposal requirements for <br /> the City of Stockton Sanitation District a sample will be collected from the <br /> holding tank before removal and analyzed for volatile hydrocarbons by EPA <br /> method 8260 and oxygenates. The initial processed water will remain on site <br />