Laserfiche WebLink
• collect samples to confirm the vapor results The results of the investigation were presented in the <br /> Soil Assessment Report prepared by Upgradient in April 1998 Subsequently, one of the borings <br /> was converted to groundwater monitor welt VM-4 <br /> In August 1999, Upgradient installed two remediation. test wells within the mapped zone of soil <br /> contamination However, no hydrocarbons were detected in any of the soil samples collected from <br /> these wells One of the wells (VT-1) was screened with 4-inch PVC casing from 15 to 30 feet for <br /> future use in soil vapor extraction testing The other well (SW-1), was screened with 2-inch PVC <br /> casing from 29 5 to 31 5 feet for potential use as an air sparging well <br /> YO PROCEDURES <br /> The depth to groundwater was measured and water samples were collected on September 27, 2001 <br /> The wells were opened and allowed to equalize with atmospheric pressure before the depth to <br /> groundwater was measured Depth measurements were recorded on the Well Monitor Report <br /> (Appendix A) and are shown in Table 1 After water depths were measured, the wells were purged <br /> of standing water by the surge-and-purge method Between 6 and 8 gallons of water were removed <br /> from each well, and temperature and electrical conductivity were measured at 2-gallon intervals <br /> ,during purging (Appendix A) Purged water was stored in a DOT-approved dram in the southwest <br /> corner of the site <br /> After purging, samples were collected from each well Two 40-m1 vials were collected from each, <br /> labeled, and placed in a cooled ice chest The samples were later transported to Excelchem <br /> Environmental Laboratory for analysis The laboratory report is included in Appendix B <br /> 4.0 RESULTS <br /> 4.1 Depth to Groundwater and Hydraulic Gradient <br /> The depth to groundwater on September 27 averaged 314 feet (Table 1), which is about 5 inches <br /> shallower than it was at this time last year and 1 foot deeper than it was in June of this year <br /> Figure 3 illustrates the hydraulic gradient and general direction of groundwater flow There <br /> appears to be a shallow trough in the hydraulic gradient in the central portion of the site, which as <br /> somewhat unusual Normally, groundwater elevation contours are relatively linear in a <br /> northwest-southeast direction Due to this trough, the groundwater flow direction appears to be to <br /> the southeast <br /> 4 2 Analytical Results <br /> Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon and BTEX concentrations increased to some wells and decreased <br /> in others during the quarter(Table 2) Concentrations were much lower in VM-1 but much <br /> r <br /> 3 - <br />