My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0004413
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAIN
>
800
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0539293
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0004413
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2019 3:29:47 PM
Creation date
11/20/2019 3:23:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0004413
RECORD_ID
PR0539293
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0022465
FACILITY_NAME
VALLEY MOTORS
STREET_NUMBER
800
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
MAIN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
800 E MAIN
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
in VM-4 In December 1997, the water level was 4 to 5 feet over screen in VM-2 and VM-3, and <br /> 6 to 7 feet over screen in MW-1 <br /> 4.2 Groundwater Gradient <br /> Figure 3 illustrates the general direction of groundwater flow Presently, flow is to the east- <br /> northeast The gradient decreases from 0 0055 ft/ft in the northern part of the site to 0 0022 ft/ft <br /> in the southern part of the site The steeper gradient near VM-4 is probably due to the low- <br /> permeability clay that is present in the northern part of the site This clay may confine <br /> groundwater to a slightly deeper depth by restricting flow from the west <br /> 4.3 Analytical Results <br /> Despite the fact that the static water level is considerably above the screened interval in three of <br /> the four wells, there has been no decrease in hydrocarbon concentrations in any of the wells In <br /> fact, concentrations in VM-1 have risen slightly, concentrations in VM-2 have risen significantly, <br /> and concentrations in VM-3 have risen above detection limits for the first time (Table 2) These <br /> increases are almost certainly caused by groundwater rising into the contaminated vadose zone <br /> and dissolving residual gasoline <br /> Gasoline and benzene concentrations are contoured in Figures 4 and 5 The maps confirm <br /> previous speculation that the dispenser was the source of the unauthorized release They also <br /> indicate that contamination has migrated to the cast and southeast since water samples were last <br /> collected. in December 1997, implying that the plume has enlarged Normally, as contaminants <br /> spread out, they become diluted and concentrations decrease In this case, however, <br /> concentrations have increased, which indicates that soil in the vicinity of the former dispenser <br /> island is still a source for further groundwater contamination <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> As anticipated, the depth to groundwater has continued to decrease from its levels in 1997, but <br /> the water samples collected in August yielded unexpected results Despite the fact that the static <br /> water level is more than 10 feet above the screen in most wells, hydrocarbons continue to be <br /> detected at increasing concentrations in all wells These results imply that not only is the plume <br /> spreading, the overall mass of contaminants in groundwater is continuing to increase For this to <br /> occur, there must be a continuing source of gasoline to provide hydrocarbons to groundwater <br /> Presumably, this source is the contaminated soil that exists in the depth interval 10-35 feet in the <br /> northwest corner of the property, in the area around VM-2 and HP-4 (Figure 2) Additional <br /> information on the extent of soil contamination can be found in the April 1998 Soil Assessment <br /> Report prepared by Upgradient <br /> At this time, most of the information that is required for the preparation of a Problem Assessment <br /> Report as defined in Appendix A of the Tri-Regional Board Recommendations for Preliminary <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.