Laserfiche WebLink
The /ear that Mr. Huduke acquired the property is not known , but <br /> -tt the time of possession , there were two (2) 5 ,000 gallon UST, s <br /> al read y in place. The date of their installation is not known . <br /> but they were reported to be aut Ot sevice since March , 1987. <br /> The t<anP s were never Used by the present owner , who has operated <br /> a LISPd car buss n2sS on the site since acgUi ri nq the property. It <br /> IT, aSisumed { li a I. somv-�t i me prior to Mr. HydW e s ownership that the <br /> site had been Used tor- the storage and dispensing of oasol i ne , <br /> al thn(+gh the two (_1) dispensing pumps had been removod prior- to <br /> + tie removal of ttie UST s. <br /> SUr'IMAk Y OF F F- I Ok WORD <br /> On October 22, 199(') , two (^) gallon UST s were removed from <br /> iho pr operty byl Sic-bold Corp EXHIBITS A, � ,& C are cop-Les of <br /> ttie S4an Joaquin Co. EHD Undergroc(nd Tani— Program official <br /> ln!-.gje(-t i(an [Report and SJ'LHD - Hndergr(aund Tank Closure/Abandon-- <br /> mRnt ln _pection reports that doce.lment this wort . EXHIRIJ B <br /> per- tacii� tci the most norther-1y tanF which was identified as tanl <br /> IF;4��i1r6-+=y1 _ On this report, it was noted that a large holm <br /> e 1 s teci on the undorneath si do of the south end of the tant , and <br /> lual ed ttQpro im7tol gallons of rinsate in the pit e, cavation <br /> and onto the stroc-t . I he Stocl­ ton Fi rc� Depar trnent responded to <br />• this= �,piII and a SG,n Juaqc(iri County , Notification of Hazardous <br /> Was:;a_c? Di s(_Ii kr-gc,, (E BCH E B I T Dom) was filed on November 27 , 1990. <br /> Thi : report indicates that .appro imately 7�0 gallons of benzene , <br /> Xy 1 (an,-2 , T al (-(en,= were rel eAsfssed instead of the rinsate . which was <br /> "Simple (green" as indicated on EXHIEIT_ B. No mention is made of <br /> how those three compounds were i dente +i ed in the field; Such a <br /> dei +�-r rni nat i on would rc%ctc(i re sophi :tet i cated laboratory analysis , <br /> riot_ 10oty to hatie been avai lablc� on siVe at the time the wort <br /> was done. <br /> There i --, also -some:} con+usi on between the documents as to which <br /> 1 ant- hRd the hole. It is our- opinion that it was tan! #1 , based <br /> on the laboratory results of the soi 1 samples, (refer to EXHIBIT <br /> �) taken at the time of the tanF removals, <br /> On October 22, 19961 FGL Environmental Laboratory personel toot <br /> soil ;arnpl e5 F---1 ?• P-' at a depth of 4 feet from the trench which <br /> hitd contained the piping connecting the tants to the di spensi na <br /> pufript�. On 1-he fume date, FGL personel obtained soil sample #7 , <br /> which was tat.-c-n at FA d(2pth Of 14 feet from the base of the pit <br /> Ga cavation ((nderlyinQ the north end of removed tank #1 . On <br /> October 27 , FGL personel returned to the site and obtained soil <br /> samples 44 , #5, °, #6 from the base of the e-cavation. Sample #4 <br /> was ti0 en at a depth of 17, underlyinq the south end of removed <br /> tar(I 41 ; sample W5 was ta4 en at I" beneath the north end of <br /> r Eamr-ved tariF #C; and sample #6 was obtained from 1 - beneath the <br /> i ou i h enfj of removed tanl• 42. Field notes indicate that soil <br />