Laserfiche WebLink
? On page three of the report,you checked "yes" to the question—Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If <br /> yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced and list the manufacturer name and model <br /> for all replacement parts in Section E below. I am not aware that any monitoring equipment was replaced at the <br /> time of the inspection. Please clarify what monitoring equipment was replaced in Section E of your report. <br /> ? On page three of the report, you checked "no"to the question—Was liquid found inside any secondary <br /> containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) product, water. If yes, describe causes in <br /> Section E, below. During the inspection on October 28, 2015, a small amount of water was found in both diesel <br /> STP sumps and the water was removed during the inspection. The detection of water in the two sumps was <br /> documented as violation 320 in the amended inspection report dated November 9, 2015 submitted by me. <br /> Please review the above and make the necessary revisions to your report and resubmit your MSC report to the San <br /> Joaquin County Environmental Health Department. <br /> Thank you, Nik. <br /> Vicki McCartney, Senior REHS <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department <br /> 1868 East Hazelton Avenue <br /> Stockton, California 95205 <br /> Phone: (209) 468-9852 <br /> Email: vmccartney(o)-sicehd.com <br /> r <br /> 2 <br />