My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0007887
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WEBER
>
1325
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545007
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0007887
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/5/2019 2:30:56 PM
Creation date
12/5/2019 1:43:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0007887
RECORD_ID
PR0545007
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0025604
FACILITY_NAME
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY
STREET_NUMBER
1325
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
WEBER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1325 W WEBER AVE
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-Chemical Neutralization <br /> Chemical neutralization involves treating the ground water to <br /> neutralize the compounds present Neutralization is only used for <br /> ground water affected by acidic or alkaline conditions, rather than <br />' hydrocarbons This treatment alternative is not effective for <br /> hydrocarbons and therefore has been eliminated <br /> No Action <br /> In the no action alternative, no measures would be taken to contain or <br /> treat the hydrocarbon-containing ground water at the site No action <br /> would be taken to remediate the site This passive response would <br /> employ natural biodegradation as the only treatment <br /> This alternative could be easily implemented as no action is required <br /> It would also be the least expensive alternative However, this <br /> alternative may not effectively remediate ground water and would not <br /> satisfy the timeliness criterion Therefore, the no action alternative is <br /> not considered an appropriate alternative <br /> Selected Alternative <br /> The results of the engineering evaluation identified preferred <br /> alternatives for the remediation of both hydrocarbon-containing soils <br /> and ground water at the site For site sods, the preferred alternative is <br /> excavation and on-site aeration of hydrocarbon-containing sods This <br /> alternative is favored because it would be an effective and easily <br /> implemented remedial alternative for site soils In addition, on-site <br /> aeration would be very cost-effective and could be implemented in a <br /> timely manner <br /> For ground water, the preferred alternative entails the extraction of a <br /> fixed volume of hydrocarbon-containing ground water from both sites, <br /> aeration of the extracted water, and discharge to the sewer If necessary, <br />' the extracted ground water could first be polished with liquid-phase <br /> activated carbon prior to discharge to the sewer This alternative <br /> would be cost-effective and easily implemented at the site <br /> Section 5 provides a detailed description of the implementation plan, <br /> and Section 6 discusses the proposed schedule <br /> 4-9 <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.