Laserfiche WebLink
E <br /> KLEINFELDER <br /> F <br /> Service, Department of Environmental Health Division (PHS/EHD) had requested that B&B <br /> Equipment Company submit a workplan to evaluate the lateral and vertical extent of ; <br /> contamination. Kleinfelder submitted a proposal titled "Proposal/Cost Estimate, Limited Soil 1 <br /> Sampling and Analysis, Former Underground Storage Tank, B&B Equipment Company, 3132 <br /> Farmington Road, Stockton, California, dated May 14, 20.01 to assess the specific concerns <br /> described above. Mr. Bywater requested a change of scope to this proposal. The original scope <br /> of work included utilizing push probes in and around the UST area to assess soil conditions. Mr. <br /> Bywater requested that Kleinfelder submit a workplan using a backhoe instead of push probes. <br /> Kleinfelder submitted an addendum to our original proposal to PHS/EHD titled "Addendum to <br /> Proposal YP1-568 dated May 14, 2001, Limited Soil Sampling And Analysis", dated July 23, <br /> 2001. PHS/EHD approved the proposal/workplan and the addendum. The following is a <br /> summary of Kleinfelder's findings of our field activities, which commenced on September 20, <br /> 2001, <br /> FIELD ACTIVITIES <br /> 9 <br /> Mr. Doug Heard, Project Geologist for Kleinfelder visitedthe site on September 20, 2001 to <br /> collect soil samples near the former UST area for evaluation of potential fuel constituents. The <br /> former UST area was indentified by Mr. Bywater, owner of the site (Plate 1). <br /> s Soil SaMPIW2 <br /> 't <br /> Mr. Bywater and Margaret Lagorio, unit supervisor for PHS/EHD, were present at the site. A <br /> trench measuring approximately 2' by 17' by 12 feet deep had been previously excavated <br /> through the middle of the reported UST area by Mr. Bywater. The trench and former UST area <br /> were located just north of a maintenance garage along the eastern property boundary. The trench <br /> revealed what appeared to be the tank backfill, which consisted of a dark brown gravelly clay. <br /> Native material surrounding the backfill was a brown silt ' clay. The backfill material was <br /> approximately 5 1/2 feet deep and about 5 feet wide. Some debris including wire and plastic bags <br /> were noted in this backfill area. Discolored soil or soil with a petroleum odor were not noted <br /> during the sampling activities, although a slight petroleum odor was noted from the stockpiled <br /> soil. Soil stockpiled from the trench had been placed adjacent and west of the UST area. <br /> E; <br /> A total of four discrete soil samples were collected from within the trench area, three sidewall <br /> samples and one bottom sample (below the tank backfill.) 1 A pre-cleaned stainless steel hand <br /> auger was used to advance a small hole an additional 6 inches in depth from within the trench <br /> prior to collecting each discrete soil sample. A four-point composite sample was collected from <br /> the stockpiled soil. The sidewall samples were collected at depths ranging from 3 to 5 % feet bgs <br /> along the northern, western and eastern sidewalls. A bottom sample was collected below the <br /> tank backfill area at a depth of approximately 12-feet Discrete soil samples were collected by <br /> slide hammering a 2-inch diameter by 6-inch long stainless4 steel tube into the soil. Sampling <br /> locations are illustrated on the attached Plate 1. <br /> A single four-point composite sample was also collected from approximately 15 yards of the <br /> excavated stockpiled soil located west of the UST area. The composite soil sample was collected <br /> by pushing a pre-cleaned stainless steal tube into the soil by hand. <br /> 20-4659-0 k.EO 1/2011 R1442 i Page 2 of 6 <br /> a 2001,Kleinfelder,Inc. November 28,2001 <br /> ;i <br /> f` <br />