Laserfiche WebLink
08 July 2003 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 03-1042 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> FINDINGS <br /> Field observations did not detect the presence of volatile organic compounds (utilizing the PID) or <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons-like odor in the soil samples collected. <br /> A total of five soil samples were submitted to CTEL for analysis as noted above. No target analytes <br /> were detected in the analyzed soil samples. The analytical results are summarized in Table 1.A copy <br /> of the laboratory report(CTEL Laboratory IDs 0306-193-5,0306-193-8, 0306-193-13,0306-193-16, <br /> and 0306-193-25) is included in Appendix A. <br /> RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Based upon the absence of detectable concentrations of contaminants in the soil samples, AGE <br /> recommends that no further environmental action be taken at the site. <br /> LIMITATIONS <br /> Our professional services were performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by <br /> environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities.The findings were based mainly upon <br /> analytical results provided by an independent laboratory. Evaluation of the geologic/hydrogeologic <br /> conditions at the site for the purpose of this investigation was made from a limited number of available <br /> data points (i.e. soil samples) and subsurface conditions may vary away from these data points. No <br /> other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional interpetations, opinions and <br /> recommendations contained in this report. <br /> If you have any questions or require further information,please contact our office at(209)467-1006. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental, �SS,M R gk GE��0, <br /> No. 7473 <br /> William R. Little <br /> Project Geologist slab UEoa��o- <br /> California Registered Geologist No. <br /> cc: Ms. Lori Duncan, San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department <br /> Advanced GeoEnvtronmentnl,I.e. <br />