SU0000472 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Item No. 3 PC: 7-19-90 MS-90-87 Page 5 1. None of the new lots will be occupied by owner-operators or family members. ° Mr. Connolly states that the "applicant already has nine separate parcels. These parcels range in size from 23 acres to over 90 acres. There appears to be six residences on the parcels. " The owner and her daughter live at 6997 West Canal Boulevard (APN 213-090-13) . According to the application, the owner and her daughter will move to two of the homesite parcels proposed, and the son will live at the third homesite. The applicant told the Planning staff that a farm worker now lives in the existing house on Parcel 4 and will continue to live there after the subdivision. The Planning Title does not address the number of houses or parcels an owner-operator may or may not own in order to qualify to create a homesite parcel. However_ , the owner may only create one parcel for himself and one for each family member. None, of the parcels owned by the applicant were created under the homesite provisions. 2 . The required findings for approval of the Minor Subdivision cannot be made because the lots will not be owner/farmer occupied. A finding cannot be made that this subdivision is necessary to finance a residence for the owners-operator. No finding can be made that this is necessary to finance a residence for a member of the family. ° Other than Mr. Connolly"s statement, no evidence has been presented to dispute the contention that Ms. Martins is an owner-operator. Mr. Connolly is correct in arguing that the applicant has not shown the :neg:d for the proposed lots. However, there is no required finding that the proposed hemesites are necessary. Finding No. 1 states: "The proposed map is consistent with applicable General and Specific Plans. " To be consistent with the: General Plan, the applicant must meet the requirements of the