My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FREMONT
>
0
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0515453
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2019 5:02:52 PM
Creation date
12/11/2019 4:21:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0515453
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0012156
FACILITY_NAME
NORTH SHORE PARCEL
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
FREMONT
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
FREMONT ST
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
F. Did DTSC (directly or through a contractor) actually perform the Remedial <br /> Action? <br /> Yes_ No X Name of Contractor: Treadwell&Rollo, Inc. <br /> Environmental and Geotechnical <br /> Consultants <br /> G. Was there a community relations plan in place? <br /> Yes X No_ (Public Participation Plan dated January 1, 2001) <br /> H. Was a remedial action plan developed for this site? <br /> Yes X No_ <br /> I. Did DTSC/USEPA hold a public meeting regarding the draft RAP? <br /> Yes X No_ (Public meeting was held on July 25, 2001) <br /> J. Were public comments address? Yes_ No X (No one from the <br /> public attended the public meeting, and there were no written <br /> comments received from the public notice during the public <br /> comment period) <br /> Date of DTSC/USEPA analysis and response: See comments to 9.J. <br /> K. Are all of the facts cited above adequately documented in DTSC files? <br /> Yes X No_ <br /> If no, identify areas where documentation is lacking: <br /> 10. EPA Involvement in the Remedial Action: <br /> A. Was the EPA involved in the site cleanup? Yes_ No X <br /> If yes, did EPA concur with all remedial actions? <br /> Yes_ No_ <br /> B. EPA comments: <br /> C. EPA staff involved in cleanup: <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.