My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FREMONT
>
517
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0541344
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2019 1:09:53 PM
Creation date
12/13/2019 11:01:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0541344
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0023692
FACILITY_NAME
GUARDINO & CRAWFORD
STREET_NUMBER
517
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
FREMONT
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
13721410
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
517 W FREMONT ST
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
198
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
517 West Fremont Street y Page l of 2 <br />( <br /> Nuel Henderson [EH] <br /> From : bill [wlittle@advgeoenv.com] <br /> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 12:34 PM <br /> To : Frank Girardi [EH] <br /> Cc: Nuel Henderson [EH] <br /> i <br /> Subject: 517 West Fremont Street <br /> Attachments: Guardino Well Design 0907.pdf; Guardino SITE PLAN FIGURE 2 0907.pdf <br /> Mr. Frank Girardi: <br /> AGE has reviewed the letter sent to the Responsible Party the Guardinos for the property at 517 West Fremont <br /> Street and provides the following comments. <br /> AGE reviewed the underground storage tank report from your office and determine the release occurred at the <br /> former fuel dispensing island at the eastern edge of the building (EHD letter dated 27 March 1996 and 27 June <br /> 2006). AGE has performed assessment at the location and surrounding the area utilizing geoprobe borings . The <br /> values of PID, field screening observations, analytic data and soil type indicated the release did occurred at the <br /> fuel dispensing island : The pipe line #3 sample (dispenser) contained 700 mg/kg of TPH and UST sample <br /> contained 68 mg/kg of TPH ; associated BTEX values were also greatest the former fuel dispenser; PID values <br /> from the soil samples were most consistently greater at the former fuel dispenser island boring P3 (5 feet - 922, <br /> 10 feet - 425, 20 feet 355) as compared to boring MW-1 (5 feet - 293 , 10 feet - 560 , 15 feet - 679 and 20 feet - <br /> 1 .6). The lack of sampling at boring P3 at a depth of 15 feet was due to sand and 15 feet represents the ground <br /> water table level ; a ground water sample collected from boring P8 contained the second greatest TPH and BTEX <br /> values detected on the site (second to boring P6 to be discussed later). The highest mass is concentrated at the <br /> former fuel dispenser located near boring P3 and P8 . Secondary impacted soil is present under the current water <br /> table at depth greater than 15 feet or greater, located east and northeast of boring P3 or at well MW-1 . AGE <br /> assert the location of a proposed soil vapor extraction well for extraction testing should be located at the <br /> dispenser island area. <br /> The location and construction of feasibility testing observation wells should be at boring P6 (OBW-1 ), representing <br /> a distance of 15 feet from the proposed extraction points . Further a second observation well location should be <br /> installed at the location adjacent to boring P5 (OBW-2). The wells should be 20 feet in depth to allow for static <br /> water level monitoring, thus producing adequate monitoring of the upper water table level to evaluated the <br /> performance of the ground water extraction pilot test, using a well screen which intersection the water bearing <br /> coarse grained soil at the site . A single well, screened from a depth of 5 feet to 20 feet (See Figure Attached), <br /> serves the two proposed feasibility tests and their location supplies a completion of two data gaps currently on the <br /> site (P5 and P6). The distance from the ground water extraction well are the following: MW-1 5 feet, MW-7 25 <br /> feet, OBW-1 15 feet, OBW-2 30 feet, MW-2 25 feet. The distance from the soil vapor well VW-1 should be OBW-1 <br /> 15 feet and OBW-2 30 feet, with monitoring wells MW-2, 32 4 and MW-7 at their associated distances from the soil <br /> vapor extraction well. The proposed well reduces costs for a site with multiple wells already installed and provides <br /> the best benefit for site assessment (including feasibility tests). The distance of observation points for soil vapor <br /> extraction feasibility testing should be no closer than 15 feet bsg as proposed , based on a minimum radius of <br /> influence for the soil type at present at the site (See attached Map 2). <br /> The needed assessment and feasibility testing of the site should not be delayed further and approval for the <br /> proposed pilot tests is urged, based on the time delay of the EHD review of the work plan and minimal work plan <br /> modifications proposed . Please respond as soon as possible. If questions arise, a site inspection is urged to <br /> complete the approval process . <br /> William R Little <br /> 9/28/2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.