Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> l .. 22 November 2006 <br /> AGE-NC Project No . 95-0167 <br /> Page 5 of 15 <br /> I <br /> - - HU4 - Extending from 55 feet to approximately 70 feet bsg, HU4 is composed primarily of thin, <br /> alternating layers of silty material (silt, and silt with clay). <br /> HU5 - Extending from 70 feet to approximately 80 feet bsg, HU5 is composed primarily of layers <br /> of sandy material (silty sand, sand, and fine- to coarse-grained sand). This zone exhibits uniformly <br /> low pore pressures and may be considered a flow unit. <br /> 4.0. POTENTIAL IMPACT ON NEARBY SURFACE AND GROUND WATER <br /> i_- Typically, ground water would represent the migration medium for contaminants over significant <br /> distances. Sites that are located in up-gradient or equi-gradient (cross-gradient) directions from the <br /> site are not likely to be negatively impacted by the site. Since the Deep Water Channel is <br /> approximately 400 feet up-gradient of the site, impacted water at the site does not pose a threat to <br /> beneficial uses of the Stockton Deep Water Channel. Currently the Stockton Deep Water Channel <br /> is impacted with semi-volatile organic compounds and suffers from secondary water quality <br /> objective threats : dissolved oxygen, salt water and pesticides. <br /> F1Drinking water near the site is supplied by the City of Stockton and Cal Water from municipal wells. <br /> The first encountered ground water is not used for drinking or irrigation, although all ground water <br /> in the Stockton area is considered to be of potential beneficial use. The Cal Water well at Lindsey <br /> Street and Edison Street is located at a considerable distance in an equi-gradient direction from the <br /> site, and therefore is not likely to be effected by site conditions. The nearest down-gradient municipal <br /> well is located approximately 2,400 feet northeast of the site. The distance of this well from the site <br /> ! limits its potential to be adversely impacted by the site (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, <br /> 16 October 1995 and 16 November 1995). <br /> 5.0. SOIL REMEDIATION ALTERNATIVES <br /> —I Based on the distribution and concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil at the site and on <br /> site-specific conditions, AGE believes excavation or soil vapor extraction with natural attenuation <br /> are appropriate remedial strategies to consider to address hydrocarbon-impacted soil at the site. <br /> 5 . 1 . SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION <br /> Soil vapor extraction (SVE) is a well-accepted method of treatment for hydrocarbon-impacted soil <br /> and has been used at numerous sites with an excellent rate of success. The method is most effective <br /> on volatile hydrocarbons in permeable soil. <br /> I` <br /> _ Advanced GeoEnvironmental, Inc. <br />