Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Beth Thayer <br /> Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> Page 2 <br /> Our response to these issues raised by SJEHD are as follows: <br /> 1. Best available technology for treating groundwater has <br /> typically not been successful at reaching MCLS, much less ND, for <br /> aromatic hydrocarbons in groundwater. Many sites have been closed <br /> with levels higher than those recorded at Nor-Cal. Leaving these <br /> levels in place in not unprotective of public health or beneficial <br /> uses of groundwater in this area. It would appear that SJEHD <br /> recognized these arguments previously since they requested your <br /> concurrence in closing the site, stating "all appropriate response <br /> actions have been completed, that all acceptable remedial practices <br /> were implemented, and that no further investigation, remedial <br /> action, or monitoring" was required. We note that on page 10-11 of <br /> the State Board Resolution 92-49 it states that the degree of <br /> threat to water quality and beneficial uses as well as the <br /> financial burden , whether to the discharger or the State, should <br /> be considered when prescribing investigative and clean--up action <br /> levels. <br /> 2 . We have reviewed the County file for the site referenced by <br /> SJEHD with respect to the divergent gradient. This site is the <br /> Stockton Metropolitan Transit (SMART) property located <br /> approximately 1500 feet west of Nor-Cal. The file does indicate a <br /> SE-SW gradient over approximately one year of monitoring, however, <br /> the gradient magnitude is consistently very low, around . 001 (5 <br /> feet per mile) , and the three wells on which this is based are all <br /> within approximately 40 feet of each other. This low gradient <br /> calculated from a tight well cluster means that small errors in <br /> surveying or well elevation measurement will drastically affect <br /> gradient calculations. More importantly, the quarterly reports <br /> repeatedly note that wellheads were submerged at the time of <br /> monitoring and the reports show the bus wash area and associated <br /> water sump is immediately (less than 15 feet) north-northwest of <br /> the monitoring wells, again suggesting site specific reasons for <br /> the calculated gradient. Although only small amounts of dissolved <br /> contamination have been recorded at the SMART site, it is important <br /> to note that well MW-3 (to the west of the tank pit and ostensibly <br /> the upgradient well) had equivalent benzene concentrations and <br /> higher toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene concentrations than did <br /> 'downgradient' well MW-2 . This suggests that historically, at <br /> least on average, the gradient has a component to the west or <br /> northwest. <br /> As an additional check on our original work we obtained another <br /> nearby site file (Union Ice) located at the northwest corner of <br /> Lindsay and Union Streets (approximately 2500 feet due west of the <br /> Nor-Cal site) . The gradient at Union Ice is . 0025 to the <br /> northwest, also consistent with a convergence of the local gradient <br /> • in this part of Stockton toward Ragu Foods located 3500 feet due <br /> north of the Nor-Cal site where large volumes of water are pumped <br />