| 
								        		SECOND QUARTER 2005 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
<br />  '      	None of the analytes of interest were detected in the groundwater samples collected from MW 10 and
<br />    		MW 11 R. BTEX constituents were detected in the groundwater samples col lected from MW 1, MW2,
<br />    		MW3, MW5, MW6, and MW8. The highest concentrations of benzene, 5,900 gg/L and 4,900 gg/L,
<br />  '      	were detected in the groundwater samples collected from MW8 and MWI, respectively. TPHg was
<br />    		detected in the groundwater samples collected from MWI, MW2, MW3, MW5, MW6, MW8, and
<br />    		MW9. The highest concentrations of TPHg, 180,000 gg/L and 130,000 gg/L, were detected in the
<br />  '      	groundwater samples collected from MWI  and MW8, respectively. MTBE was detected in the
<br />    		groundwater samples collected from MW2, MW3, MW4, MW7, MW9, and MW12 at concentrations
<br />    		ranging from 1.1 gg/L to 29 gg/L, respectively. The highest concentration of MTBE was detected in
<br />  '      	the groundwater sample collected from MW2. 1,2-DCA was detected in the groundwater samples
<br />    		collected from MWI through MW9 and MW12 at concentrations ranging from 1.2 gg/L to 730 µg/L.
<br />    		The highest concentration of 1,2-DCA was detected in the groundwater sample collected from MW8.
<br />  '      	TBA was detected in the groundwater samples collected from MW2 and MW3 at concentrations of
<br />    		43 gg/L and 22 gg/L, respectively. Analytical results of groundwater samples are summarized in
<br />    		Table 2. Laboratory data sheets and chain-of-custody documentation are contained in Attachment 2.
<br />  '      	lsoconcentration maps depicting benzene, MTBE, and I,2-DCA concentrations in the groundwater
<br />    		samples collected from the shallow zone during the second quarter of 2005 are shown on Figures 15,
<br />    		16,  and   17,  respectively.  Isoconcentration  maps  depicting  benzene,  MTBE,  and   1,2-DCA
<br />    		concentrations in the groundwater samples collected from the intermediate zone during the second
<br />    		quarter of 2005 are shown on Figures 18, 19, and 20, respectively.
<br />  1      	GEOTRACKER DATA UPLOAD
<br />    		The depth to water and laboratory data associated with the first quarter 2005 sampling event were
<br />    		submitted electronically to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Geotracker database
<br />    		(confirmation  numbers  7878880143  and  7412053465,  respectively)_  Laboratory  analytical  data
<br />    		associated with the groundwater sample collected from MW11R on April  18, 2005, were also
<br />    		submitted to the SWRCB Geotracker database (confirmation number 6174878656). Depth to water
<br />    		and laboratory data associated with the second quarter 2005 sampling event (confirmation numbers
<br />    		7367721378 and 2289769172, respectively); depth to water and laboratory data associated with the
<br />    		fourth  quarter  2004  sampling  event  (confirmation  numbers   1158308267  and  2682675778,
<br />    		respectively); laboratory data associated with soil samples collected during the installation of MW5
<br />   		through MW12 (confirmation number  1858622312); and boring logs for MW5 through MW11,
<br />  '
<br />    		MWI IR, and MW12 (confirmation numbers 9920728385, 1028669059, 9448943912, 2650525748,
<br />    		6072354972,  5084684073,  2957181632, 2375730216,  and  3273038566,  respectively) were also
<br />    		submitted to the SWRCB Geotracker database.  Documentation of the data submittal is contained in
<br />    		Attachment 4.
<br />    		CONCLUSIONS
<br />  '      	The laboratory analytical results of the groundwater samples collected from MWI through MW 10,
<br />    		MW 11 R, and MW12   in March  and June 2005  are  generally consistent with recent historical
<br />    		analytical results of groundwater samples collected from these wells. MWI and MW8 located in the
<br />    		s:lenviromental1283491reports12005 1 &2 QMR.doc     	5    						ATC Associates Inc.
<br />
								 |