Laserfiche WebLink
CAAaBRIA <br /> from cone penetration testing (CPT) borings SB-12 through SB-16 and SB-18 did not contain <br /> methanol These grab groundwater samples were collected at the same depth range (and in some <br /> cases shallower and deeper)as the groundwater samples from wells S-1-85 and S-3-84 <br /> Methanol is known to degrade rapidly in the subsurface and as a result, does not migrate very far <br /> from its source Based on the low concentration (relative to the regulatory level) of methanol <br /> detected in groundwater beneath this site, methanol's rapid biodegradation, and the delineation <br /> provided by the CPT borings mentioned above, we feel that further investigation for methanol is <br /> not warranted at this site <br /> 1,2-DCA This compound was added to gasoline as a lead scavenger until 1991 Lead <br /> scavengers were a part of a "lead package" that was added to gasoline as an anti-knock package <br /> The "lead package" consisted of ethylene dibromide (EDB), 1,2-DCA, and one or more lead <br /> compounds Because 1,2-DCA was a component of gasoline in the past it is possible that the <br /> 1,2-DCA found beneath the subject site is due to a fuel release at this site However, 1,2-DCA is <br /> not a compound that is exclusively found in gasoline It is used in the production of soaps and <br /> vinyl chloride It is also used as a solvent and was formerly used as a fumigant Household uses <br /> of 1,2-DCA include cleaning solvents, glues,varnishes, and strippers <br /> Groundwater samples collected from wells S-1-85, S-3-84, and S-4-83 contained 1,2-DCA <br /> concentrations ranging from 45 to 74 ppb (Table 1) Groundwater samples collected from the <br /> shallow groundwater monitoring wells have most recently contained 1,2-DCA at concentrations <br /> ranging from 2 8 to 540 ppb Grab groundwater samples collected from bonngs during previous <br /> investigations at the subject site have contained 1,2-DCA concentrations as high as 1,640 ppb <br /> (Table 2) 1,2-DCA has only been detected (0 141 parts per million) in one out of 79 soil <br /> samples collected beneath the site <br /> The 1,2-DCA analytical results of groundwater samples collected to date are shown on Figure 2 <br /> A review of Figure 2 shows a rather uneven distribution of 1,2-DCA in the subsurface Boring <br /> SB-8, which contained no 1,2-DCA in groundwater, is located approximately 18 feet north of <br /> boring SB-4, which has contained the highest level of 1,2-DCA in groundwater at the subject <br /> site North (up/crossgradient) of boring SB-8 (approximately 95 feet away) is boring SB-18, <br /> which contained 1,2-DCA at concentration ranging from 25 to 140 ppb It would seem that if the <br /> 1,2-DCA found in SB-18 originated from the subject site that it would be present in intermediate <br /> sampling locations (SB-8) as well This anomaly is repeated in the groundwater analytical data <br /> from borings SB4, SB-10 and SB-15, where SB-10, the intermediate sampling point contains no <br /> 1,2-DCA and the SB-4 and SB-15 contain 1,2-DCA These anomalies make it unclear as to <br /> whether the 1,2-DCA originates from a fuel release at this site <br /> 0797 2 <br />