Laserfiche WebLink
11 June 2001 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 97-0327 <br /> Page 2 of Q <br /> 2.2. GROUND WATER SAMPLING <br /> Following well purging,ground water levels in the wells achieved a minimum of 80 percent recharge <br /> ' prior to sample collection. Ground water samples were collected from the purged wells utilizing <br /> new, disposable polyethylene bailers, three 40-m1 EPA-approved VOA vials containing 0.5 m] 18% <br /> hydrochloric acid as a sample preservative and one-liter amber bottles without preservative. Care <br /> ' was taken to ensure that visible air bubbles were not present in the vials after filling and capping. <br /> Ground water sample containers were labeled with the well designation, date, time, and sampler's <br /> initials. <br /> 2.3. LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br />' Each ground water sample was logged on a chain-of-custody form, placed in a chilled container and <br /> transported to a California Department of Health Services (DHS)-certified laboratory for analysis <br /> for: <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline and diesel (TPH-g and TPH-d, <br /> respectively) by EPA Method 5030/8015M and LUFT/EPA 8015B, <br /> • Volatile aromatic compounds - benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and xylene (BTEX) with <br />' methyl-tertiary butyl ether(MTBE) by EPA Method 8020, and <br /> • Fuel oxygenated compounds - ethylene dibromide (EDB), dichloroethane (1,2 DCA), <br />' methanol, ethanol, tertiary butanol (TBA), di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tert butyl ether <br /> (ETBE) and tert amyl methyl ether(TAME), and MTBE by EPA Method 8260 Modified. <br />' 3.0. FINDINGS <br />' Ground water elevation, flow direction and gradient were determined from field data collected on <br /> 16 February 2001; the contaminant impact to ground water was assessed from the laboratory data. <br /> 1 <br /> 3.1. RELATIVE GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT <br /> =- - The depths to ground water-in wells MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3 were between 50.58 and'52:07 feet <br /> below the tops of the well casings;ground water elevations at the site were calculated to be between <br /> 25.07 feet and 25.23 feet below mean sea level. Ground water elevation at the site decreased an <br /> average 1.87 feet between the August 2000 and the February 2001 ground water monitoring events. <br /> a' Ground water elevations are depicted in Figure 3. <br /> Ground water flow direction at the site was inferred to be toward the south at a gradient of 0.002 fl/ft <br />' Advanced CeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br />