Laserfiche WebLink
to 11 June 2001 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 97-0327 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br />' or less, or approximately I 1 feet per mile (Figure 3). <br /> 3.2. LABORATORY RESULTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> A total of three ground water samples were submitted to a DHS-certified laboratory for analysis of <br /> TPH-g, TPH-d,BTEX and fuel oxygenated compounds. TPH-g was not detected in water samples <br /> collected from MW-1, MW-2 or MW-3; however, TPH-d was detected in all three samples at <br /> concentrations as high as 180 ,ugll. <br /> BTEX compounds were not detected in ground water samples collected from MW-1, MW-2 or <br /> MW-3. <br /> MTBE was detected(EPA Method 8260)in ground water samples collected from wells MW-1 and <br />' MW-2 at concentrations of 1.7 and 15/.cg/l respectively; TAME was detected in the sample collected <br /> from well MW-2 at a concentration of 40µg/1; 1,2-DCA was detected in samples from wells MW-1 <br /> and MW-2 at concentrations of 4.1 and 2.7µg/l.No other fuel oxygenated compounds were detected <br />' by laboratory analysis. Analytical results of the ground water samples are summarized in Tables 2 <br /> and 3. The laboratory reports (Castle Analytical Laboratory Reference No. 3539 and McCampbell <br /> Analytical Inc. Lab I.D. 60546 through 60548) and chain-of-custody forms are presented in <br /> Appendix B. <br />' 4.0. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> The implications of the findings from the February 2001 ground water monitoring event are as <br /> follows: <br /> • Ground water flow direction at the site was inferred to be toward the south at a gradient of <br /> 0.002 ft/ft or less; due to the low gradient at the site, slight variations in ground water <br /> measurements or changes of recharge/discharge of the local ground water could greatly <br />' modify ground water flow direction. <br /> • The decrease of ground water elevation of approximately 1.87 feet between August 2000 and <br /> February 2001 is probably due to seasonal fluctuation. <br />' • Dissolved TPH-d was detected in samples collected from wells MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3; <br /> the greatest TPH-d concentrations have been detected from wells MW-2 and MW-3 while <br /> low concentrations have been detected from well MW-1. <br /> Low concentrations of dissolved MTBE and 1,2-DCA were detected in samples from wells <br /> MW-1 and MW-2 indicating a minor impact to ground water in the area assessed. <br /> • Minor concentrations of dissolved TAME were detected in the sample collected from well <br /> MW-2; TAME had not been detected from previous ground water monitoring events. <br /> • TBA had previously been detected in wells MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3, but was not detected <br />' Advanced CeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br />