Laserfiche WebLink
Vincent Westphal • - 6 - • 28 July 2003 <br /> same treatment/disposal method as that under study by the Wine Institute; however, BCW is not <br /> monitoring its discharge to the level described in the Wine Institute's report. The required <br /> additional groundwater monitoring wells are necessary to determine whether groundwater has <br /> been, or will be, degraded. <br /> At this late date, BCW has objected to performing the technical studies required to answer the <br /> uncertainties raised during the tentative WDR review process. Staff notes that the volume of <br /> wastewater discharged is proposed to increase dramatically over the next ten years as the winery is <br /> expanded. .Delay of technical studies that were requested by BCW to provide data for the WDRs is <br /> not productive. The technical reports required in the 28 April 2003 CWC Section 13267 Order <br /> must be submitted. Failure to submit the reports, or submission of inadequate or late reports, may <br /> result in enforcement actions which could include fines of up to $1,000 per day per report. If an <br /> acceptable groundwater monitoring well installation report is not submitted by 27 August 2003, <br /> then staff will recommend that enforcement actions be taken against BCW. If you have any <br /> questions,please contact Tim O'Brien at(916) 255-3116 or myself at(916) 255-3135. <br /> " a�& <br /> WENDY WYELS, Chief <br /> Waste Discharge to Land Unit <br /> cc: Mike Huggins, San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department, Stockton <br /> Richard Armstrong, Fall Creek Engineering, Davis <br /> Peter Haase, Fall Creek Engineering, Santa Cruz <br /> V:\Sm_Joquin Nonl S\Stnfi\ObrimTSn Joaquin\Bu Crmk\watplW 21 July O].doc <br />