My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FURRY
>
11900
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516611
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2020 4:25:13 PM
Creation date
1/15/2020 4:17:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0516611
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0012706
FACILITY_NAME
BEAR CREEK WINERY
STREET_NUMBER
11900
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
FURRY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
06116026
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
11900 N FURRY RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
R <br /> Kurt Kautz -2 - 27 October 2015 <br /> Bear Creek Winery <br /> Improvement Schedule <br /> The ROWD stated that the organic loading rates have been excessive and have exceeded <br /> generally accepted loading rates for land disposal systems, especially during the crush period <br /> between August and October of each year. Our 5 March 2015 Incomplete ROWD letter <br /> commented that: <br /> Reducing conditions in the groundwater beneath the land application areas (LAAs) have <br /> occurred due to discharge of high concentrations of organic waste in the winery process <br /> wastewater and have promoted the dissolution of minerals that are naturally present in the <br /> soil. The RIND proposes to continue the use of rapid infiltration without demonstrating that it <br /> will not exacerbate the current groundwater pollution. The RWD must propose specific <br /> structural and/or operational improvements that will ensure that the pollution is mitigated to <br /> the maximum practical extent as quickly as possible. <br /> The ROWD proposed to install a wastewater treatment system that will include two lined <br /> aeration ponds, a trickling filtration system, and expanding the LAAs to reduce mass loading. <br /> We concur that these activities will help to reduce continued impact to groundwater, however <br /> the proposed schedule indicated that installation of the wastewater treatment system would <br /> occur in five to seven years, after expansion of the LAAs. Given the high strength nature of the <br /> wastewater from the winery (BOD in excess of 2,100 mg/L), the most effective way to reduce <br /> excessive mass loading and reducing conditions in groundwater will be to install the wastewater <br /> treatment system sooner rather than later in the sequence of facility improvements. <br /> WDRs 71-37 states that the discharge shall not cause a pollution of ground or surface waters. <br /> Groundwater monitoring data from the shallow wells that were destroyed in 2013 and their <br /> corresponding replacement deeper-interval monitoring wells indicate that groundwater <br /> degradation and pollution has occurred beneath the facility. The winery's response letter dated <br /> 30 April 2015 also stated that "localized impairment of groundwater has been observed, but the <br /> impacts do not appear to extend beyond the boundaries of the project site as water quality at <br /> the periphery is equal to background levels." <br /> The discharge has degraded groundwater and has violated the current WDRs, regardless if the <br /> source is confined within a property boundary. The current wastewater disposal practice is not <br /> in compliance with the Basin Plan and poses an unacceptable risk to the quality of waters of the <br /> state. <br /> We acknowledge Bear Creek Winery's efforts to develop a phased construction schedule that <br /> factors in balancing capital expenditures with economic realities. However, it is important to <br /> recognize the importance of prioritizing the protection of water quality within that plan. <br /> We recommend two years as a reasonable time frame to complete installation of the <br /> wastewater treatment system. Therefore, the WDRs will include a time schedule for the <br /> construction of the wastewater treatment system within two years of adoption of the WDRs. <br /> The WDRs will also require the submittal of a Pond Design Work Plan and Construction Quality <br /> and Assurance Plan in advance of pond installation. If the winery does not concur with this <br /> schedule, enforcement action may be necessary to discontinue any and all discharge that <br /> contributes to existing on-site groundwater impairments. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.