Laserfiche WebLink
TABLE IV <br /> L RESULT <br /> GROUNDWATER ANALYTICA S <br /> Well Number EPA Modified Method 8015 Hydraulic Fluid I gill <br /> MW l ND <br /> M W-2 N D <br /> MW 3 ND <br /> ND Not detected at or above reporting limit <br /> ygll micrograms per liter of water <br /> Reporting Limits <br /> TPN as Hydraulic Fluid 1300µg11 <br /> 7.5 Evaluation of Monitoring Wells <br /> During the sampling of the monitoring wells, the Integrity of the well caps and <br /> locks was evaluated The well caps and locks appeared to be to good condition <br /> The groundwater monitoring wells were secured prior to leaving the subject <br /> property <br /> 7.6 Gradient <br /> From groundwater elevations derived from monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2 and <br /> MW-3, the gradient appears to be to the north/northeast at approximately 0 001 <br /> foot/foot <br /> 8.0 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> 8.1 Findings <br /> Based on the soil excavation and results of the laboratory analysts discussed in this <br /> report, CRC identified the following significant findings <br /> • The identified soil contamination was properly excavated and disposed <br /> • The excavations were backfilled with a sand slurry mixture to within six (6) <br /> inches of surface grade and a new cement slab was poured for the elevator shaft <br /> bottom <br /> • Active groundwater remediation took place in the form of pumping over 2,000 <br /> gallons of contaminated water and mud from the excavation <br /> CRC Environmental Risk Management Inc Project N 3620-0014 <br /> George Bravante Receiver 2233 Grand Canal Boulevard <br /> January 19 1995 13 Stockton California <br />