Laserfiche WebLink
CJeaCogicaf7echnics 2nc. 1.,.I *.Md Page 2 <br /> Soil Groundwater Investigation Report <br /> Moresco <br /> Project No.251.3 <br /> w. June 7, 1999 <br /> �. 2.0 SUMMARY OF INVESTIGATION <br /> In accordance with the approved work pian and for the purpose of further investigation of the <br /> �. vertical extent of soil impacted with gasoline range petroleum hydrocarbons, Geological <br /> Technics Inc. installed one monitoring well to 110 feet below grade. This well was installed <br /> to determine if contamination had migrated into groundwater. <br /> '•' 2.1 Soil Boring Installation <br /> In an effort to further define the vertical extent of gasoline range petroleum hydrocarbons, <br /> �. one (1) soil boring was advanced. The boring was drilled to 110 feet below grade and <br /> converted into a monitoring well. The soil boring was drilled using a 10-inch outside <br /> diameter (o.d.), continuous flight, hollow stem auger owned and operated by V&W Drilling <br /> (C57# 720904). <br /> A monitoring well permit was secured from. SJC PHS/EHD and the agency was notified 48 <br /> hours prior to commencing work. The subsurface was cleared of underground utilities by <br /> L' notifying Underground Service Alert. <br /> Soil cuttings and drilling decontamination water were placed in DOT-17 55-gallon drums <br /> 6.0 and moved to along side the building until their disposal can be arranged. <br /> 2.1.1 Soil Sampling Procedure <br /> 4.0 Soil samples were collected for geological and analytical evaluation at five-foot intervals. A <br /> professional geologist working under the supervision of a registered geologist maintained a <br /> boring log providing sediment description using the USCS and field observations. Soil <br /> samples were collected in 6.0-inch brass liners using a 2.0 inch modified California split <br /> La spoon sampler. All soil samples were sealed with Teflon sheets, capped with plastic end <br /> caps, labeled, and placed in a cooler at 4° Celsius for transport to the laboratory following <br /> Chain of Custody protocol. <br /> Because every soil sample collected was not submitted for laboratory analysis, a screening <br /> process was used to gather additional information through field observation. The field <br /> screening included: <br /> a sediment type, especially grain size and clay content <br /> • moisture content <br /> • visible evidence of contamination (i.e., color change due to reduction of iron or <br /> �. discoloration from hydrocarbons and other pollutants) <br /> • measurements above background on an organic vapor meter (OVM) <br /> The OVM is a portable photo ionization detector that uses a 10.0 eV lamp to detect <br /> compounds with ionization potential below 10.0 eV (hydrocarbon range). <br /> Details on the geology encountered during the completion of the sampling event as well as <br /> the field observations are included in Section 3.2, Geology and Field Observations. <br /> 2.1.2 Soil Laboratory Analyses <br /> �. Based on field screening observations seven soil samples from the borehole were submitted <br /> to Kiff Analytical of Davis, CA (State Certified Laboratory 42236) for the following <br /> analysis: <br />