My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
G
>
GAWNE
>
16865
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0505611
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/17/2020 5:31:32 PM
Creation date
1/17/2020 3:54:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0505611
PE
2951
FACILITY_ID
FA0006807
FACILITY_NAME
MORESCO PROPERTY
STREET_NUMBER
16865
STREET_NAME
GAWNE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
18309009
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
16865 GAWNE RD
P_LOCATION
99
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
f6. Geofogica!?edmks fru. Page 3 <br /> Soil Groundwater Investigation Report <br /> Moresco <br /> Project No. 251.3 <br /> c.. June 7, 1999 <br /> • benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene (BTEX by EPA method 8260B), <br /> • gasoline range petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH-Gasoline by EPA method 826013) <br /> • oxygenated fuel compounds (MTBE, DIPE, ETBE, TAME, TBA) by EPA method <br /> LN 8260B <br /> The detection limits for these compounds are listed below. A Chain of Custody was <br /> completed for all samples collected and tracked to ensure sample integrity. <br /> Detection imus: <br /> Soil (Vg/Kg) <br /> k. <br /> 2.2 Monitoring Well Installation <br /> To investigate the possible presence of gasoline in the groundwater at this site, Geological <br /> Technics Inc. installed one groundwater monitoring well through the former UST location <br /> (Figure 2, Site Map). <br /> The monitoring well was constructed using 4.0-inch diameter PVC casing with flush threads. <br /> The screened interval on MW-1 extends from the water table to fifteen feet below the water <br /> table (95-110 feet bgs). Groundwater was encountered at approximately 95 feet below grade. <br /> A #12 sand filter pack surrounds and extends two feet above the 0.010" screened interval and <br /> was topped by a three foot bentonite chip transition seal installed on top of the filter pack. A <br /> ,y surface seal was achieved by pumping a neat cement grout (augmented with <4% bentonite) <br /> via a tremie tube. The well was secured with a locking watertight cap encased in a flush <br /> mounted traffic rated well box. <br /> 60 On April 5, 1999 Don Light of Del Tech mobilized to the site to developed the new <br /> monitoring well (using mechanical surging and pumping methods) until a clear stream of <br /> water was obtained. On April 8, 1999, Don Light returned to the site to purge and collect a <br /> LN groundwater sample from the monitoring well. On May 19, 1999, Don Light returned to the <br /> site to purge and collect a second set of groundwater samples from the monitoring well. All <br /> development and purge water was containerized in 55-gallon DOT approved containers and <br /> stored on site until its disposition can be arranged. <br /> 2.2.1 Groundwater Sampling Procedure <br /> The groundwater in the new well was sampled no sooner than 24 hours after well <br /> t.0 development. The following was the procedure for the sampling of groundwater from the <br /> well: <br /> L. Before sampling was attempted the well was sounded for depth to water. The wells were <br /> then purged of at least 3 well volumes of stagnant water using a submersible pump. Purging <br /> continued until the temperature, conductivity, and pH of the groundwater has stabilized <br /> (<10% variation between three readings) indicating that formation water representative of <br /> aquifer conditions was entering the well. These water quality parameters were measured at <br /> intervals of each well volume purged. <br /> A stainless steel bailer was used to collect each sample. Care was taken to minimize sample <br /> agitation from the initial filling of the bailer to the transfer of the sample to the VOA vials. <br /> V <br /> I.r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.