SU0012847 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Potentially Less Than Less Than Analyzed Significant Si nificantwith Significant No In The 9 Mitigation 9 Impact Ircorporated Impact Impact Prior EIR VIII.GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the Cl environment? b)Conflict with an applicable plan,policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse El 11 gases? Impact Discussion: a-b) Emissions of GHGs contributing to global climate change are attributable in large part to human activities associated with the industrialimanufacturing, utility, transportation, residential, and agricultural sectors. Therefore, the cumulative global emissions of GHGs contributing to global climate change car be attributed to every nation,-egion, and city,and virtually every individual on earth.An individual project's GHG emissions are at a micro-scale level relative to global emissions and effects to global climate change: however, an individual project could result in a cumulatively considerable incremental contribution to a significant cumulative macro-scale impact.As such,impacts related to emissions of GHG are inherently considered cumulative impacts. Implementation of the underlying project would cumulatively contribute to increases of GHG emissions.Estimated GHG emissions attributable to future development would be primarily associated with increases of carbon dioxide (COz) and, to a lesser extent,other GHG pollutants, such as methane(CH4)and nitrous oxide(N20)associated with area sources, mobile sources or vehicles, utilities (electricity and natural gas), water usage, wastewater generation,and the generation of solid waste.The primary source of GHG emissions for the project would be mobile source emissions.The common unit of measurement for GHG is expressed in terms of annual metric tons of CO2 equivalents(MTCOxeiyr). As noted previously, the underlying project will be subject to the rules and regulations of the SJVAPCD. The SJVAPCD has adopted the Guidance for Valley Land-use Agencies in Addressing GHG Emission impacts for New Projects under CEQA and the District Policy—Addressing GHG Emission Impacts for Stationary Source Projects Under CEQA When Senning as the Lead Agency.1 The guidance and policy rely on the use of performance-oased standards othervnse known as Best Performance Standards(BPS) to assess significance of project specific greeniouse gas emissions on global climate change during the environmental review process, as required by CEQA. To be determined to have a less-than•significant individual and cumulative impact with regard to GHG emissions, projects must include BPS sufficient to reduce GHG emissions by 29 percent when compared to Business As Usual(BAU y GHG emissions.Per the SJVAPCD,BAU is defined as projected emissions for the 2002- 2004 baseline period. Projects which do not achieve a 29 percent reduction from BAU levels with BPS alone are required to quantify additional project-specific reductions demonstrating a combined reduction of 29 percent Potential mitigation measures may include, but not limited to:on-site renewable energy (e.g. solar photovoltaic systems), electric vehicle charging stations, the use of alternative-fueled vehicles, exceeding Title 24 energy efficiency standards the installation of energy-eff cient lighting and control systems, the installation of energy- efficient mecharical systems,the installation of drought-tolerant landscap.ng, efficient irrigation systems,and the use of low-flow plumbing fixtures. It should be noted that neither the SJVAPCD nor the County provide project-level thresholds for construction-related GHG emissions.Construction GHG emissions are a one-time release and are,therefore,not typically expected to generate a significant contribution to global climate change. I San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Guidance for Valley Land-use Agencies in Addressing GHG Emission impacts for New Projects under CEQA. December 17, 2009.San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District. District PoIPy Addressing GHG Emission Impacts for Stationary Source Projects Under CEQA When Serving as the Lead Agency.December 17,2009. 14 Planning Commission Staff Report, Item # 1 02/06/2020 — PA-1800316 (UP) 17 Environmental Review